Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Google to Dump Windows Internally Due to Security Concerns - hackers came thru the windows
Daily Tech ^ | June 1, 2010 9:22 AM | Jason Mick (Blog)

Posted on 06/01/2010 9:02:23 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

New hires are being given the choice of using Macs or Linux

Google is one of the most creative and powerful tech companies in the world, thus its actions are scrutinized at times.  However, it's hard not to see a bit of significance in this one -- Google is reportedly phasing out Windows due to security concerns.

News of the plan broke as Google remains reeling from a major intrusion by Chinese hackers which occurred using an unprotected flaw in Internet Explorer 6.  Back in early February, Google announced that it would be dropping dedicated support for Internet Explorer 6, leaving a fifth of customers on the market behind.

Now, according to an extensive story in the Financial Times, it's carrying out a slow purge of Windows from its corporate IT infrastructure.  Describes an employee, "We’re not doing any more Windows. It is a security effort.  Many people have been moved away from [Windows] PCs, mostly towards Mac OS, following the China hacking attacks."

Google employs over 10,000 people worldwide.  The company is reportedly now giving new hires an option of choosing between a Mac or a Linux box.  Most new employees at Google seem satisfied with this selection. 

Comments one employee, "Linux is open source and we feel good about it.  Microsoft we don’t feel so good about."

And why use Apple, a traditionally closed system?  This may stem from the fact that Google and Apple long enjoyed an overly close relationship until the smartphone war transformed the pair to become rivals.  Describes one employee, "Particularly since the China scare, a lot of people here are using Macs for security."

Also, some Google employees apparently love their Macs.  Another employee chimed in, "It would have made more people upset if they banned Macs rather than Windows."

Macs and Linux systems tend to be attacked far less than Windows systems.  That's because the majority of malicious coders tend to target the biggest party -- Windows -- which holds approximately 90 percent of the market.  

Linux and Macs, while no more secure than Windows, in most cases don't have enough market share to justify coding malware for them -- thus most attacks on these platforms are essentially academic exercises. 

Mac and Linux boxes are vulnerable to cross platform attacks in some cases, but the inability to install malware makes life more difficult for cybercriminals.

Apparently getting a Windows PC these days is almost as hard as getting in to Area 51 -- "Getting a new Windows machine now requires CIO approval" claimed employees."

Google had previously made efforts to move employees voluntarily away from Windows towards Linux, the OS favored by Google.  States an employee, "Before the security, there was a directive by the company to try to run things on Google products.  [The Windows ban] was a long time coming."

Google is increasingly looking to develop its own operating systems.  It currently is dominating the smart phone market with its rapidly growing Android OS, which is based on Linux.  And later this year it hopes to unleash a netbook/tablet operating system called Chrome OS onto the world.  Chrome OS is a rather unique Linux distribution whose functionality is entirely browser based.  All the apps on the tablet are web-based and functions like printing are accomplished via web drivers.

Microsoft has yet to comment on the rejection.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: china; google; hackers; internet; maccult; macvirus; malware; windows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Mr. K
So, technically it is superior- but in marketing and user-friendliiness it SUX HARD

Since the purpose of an Operating System is to facilitate the use of a computer by a user I think the user interface is an essential technical aspect.

For some tasks that are easy to set up in Linux, it's functionality makes dealing with its shortcomings worthwhile.

Of course the same can be said for Windows. It's functionality makes it's shortcoming worth dealing with. However, Windows has a far broader scope of functionality in which it is usable for far more people.

Security is also an essential aspect of a modern OS. In that Windows has come a long way. It's biggest problem is that users commonly don't want to deal with being asked if they are sure they want the app that ran when they clicked object in the email they got from aunt Gerturde to run as Administrator and modify system files. They don't really understand what it means, so they are just going to click OK anyway to make the box go away.

21 posted on 06/01/2010 10:11:46 AM PDT by untrained skeptic

To: rightwingextremist1776

My guess is that Google is thinking the public is the idiot and won’t know they are just laying the ground work to sell their own OS.

That being said I do think Microsoft is in trouble. They simply stopped innovating with the Netscape debacle. Instead of taking Netscape head on with the idea that we will stomp them by making a better browser they got tied up in legal battles and trying to end the life of their competition by any means other than simply making a better product. Microsoft has not had a sense of direction ever since.


22 posted on 06/01/2010 10:24:58 AM PDT by precisionshootist

To: Yo-Yo

It seems like a no-brainer considering that now Microsoft is pretty much a direct competitor.


23 posted on 06/01/2010 10:27:12 AM PDT by dfwgator

To: Lees Swrd

I would also add that it no longer takes a Geek to run Linux it is now as easy if not easier than Windows. do you run Firefox, OpenOffice opps guess were they came from yep Linux or the open source community, the hardest thing I find in getting used to Linux is the program names Kaffeine, Vlc, These are media player,s! I would also add Smplayer one of if not the best media player around.
Games ah yes the most important thing, try Ultimate Edition Gamer’s download it for free burn it to a DvD and run it live you don’t even have to install to try it.
I am not against Window’s at all I just have a balky computer that did not like Vista instead of paying around $300 for an operating system I installed and started running Linux daily now I love it.


24 posted on 06/01/2010 10:38:57 AM PDT by Lees Swrd ("Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe and preserve order in the world as well")

To: precisionshootist
I agree with both of your points....Microsoft gets a lot of bad press...some deserved and some not. What I believe is the single most completely misunderstood concept is that if you replace Microsoft products with any of the unix/linux based operating systems and you are safe.....BULL CRAP! All you have done is exchange on set of risks with another. ANYBODY worth their weight in IT Security would know this...
25 posted on 06/01/2010 10:44:47 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776

To: rightwingextremist1776
Well....we could have a big debate on the differences architecturally between Unix based systems and the way Windows with it's heavily Legacy architecture system is put together...

I don't known what compares to Active X ...for Linux.

26 posted on 06/01/2010 12:12:43 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yes, yes, there are differences in each...the big picture is that real security is not just OS. All systems are vulnerable to some sort of of attack. The truth is most networks are most vulnerable from the inside. A determined advisory like state sponsored hacking (ie China)will know how to get around any OS...way too many layers to secure them all.
27 posted on 06/01/2010 1:40:40 PM PDT by rightwingextremist1776


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson