Posted on 05/25/2010 4:28:05 AM PDT by Revelation 911
Marla Gurecki-Haskins, 36, is charged with official misconduct and two counts endangering welfare of a child. She's also charged with disemminating indecent material to a minor, a felony.
According to court paperwork, she's accused of "engaging in text messaging of a sexual nature that encouraged a sexual relationship between the defendant and two 16 year old male students."
She's also accused of performing oral sex on a 17-year-old male student in her classroom during school hours.
Gurecki-Haskins was arraigned on the charges this morning. She pleaded not guilty and was released on her own recognizance.
She has been a certified special education teacher since 1996.
Police say their investigation is not over. They said they have 2,400 to 2,500 pages of material, most of it emails and text messages.
We have attached a statement from the Canandaigua School District.
“She has been a certified special education teacher since 1996”
Special education seems to have taken a different meaning since I was in school.
Your discretion notwithstanding, and with all due respect, I’m going to have to go with Not Guilty.
yeah - i was on the fence - only because I can see that with some lipstick and makeup she might paint up nicely
Not Guilty unless you’re Mr. Haskins.
This article can’t be true because public school teachers are never caught or prosecuted. The media and law enforcement only goes after priests. /SAR
Age of consent in NY is 17.
Too mannish. Guilty.
She looks a lot like Katherine Harris.
Not guilty but kind of bizarre breast bones there at her neck.
Not guilty how old do you have to be to nail a teacher legally? One was 17. Next they’ll be locking up teachers for having sex with 30 year olds.
(No I don’t really think teachers should have sex w students in classrooms).
She’s kinda David Schwimmery.
This is NY. Her union contract probably allows her to continue on payroll up until she is placed in a cell, and then her pay will pick up, retroactively no less, upon her release, at which time she will be reinstated back in her former job, or one of similar or higher position; and if higher, to include a corresponding salary adjustment.
Thing is, FLCC is right there, she could have just trolled those halls for her young boy toys and not faced what she does now.
Or in other words, "She was being paid to perform special education..."
My first reaction too. Then I started thinking.........................................candlelight, a red silk camisole and silk g string, a bottle of champagne, a handful of LEVITRA,.........................I don’t know! I’m going to have to go with NOT GUILTY!
Hmmmm, thats a classy way of putting it. (Not trying to be mean, but that is pretty raw) I know, we have all had our fantasies. Mine was Miss Henley in 1970. Very cute English teacher sitting on the front of her desk, crossing and uncrossing her legs. Everybody, even the girls thought there was something very weird going on there. She was gone after one year.
Not guilty.
Back in my day, we gave an apple to the teacher.
Teachers these days prefer bananas... what can you say?
Can the jury deliberate over say 2 shots of JD? The jury is still determining the relevance of those gi-normous breast bones.
At 17, that would sure as heck been special education for me. I'd have been learning something brand new.
And in class? A class project?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.