Obama’s Regulatory Czar Pushes Creepy Plan for Legally Controlling Internet Information
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2516059/posts
Please Don’t Wake the Sleeping Bureaucrat
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2510012/posts
“Proving that the elves of Washington never sleep, the FCC moved to defy the DC Court of Appeals, which last month ruled that the FCC lacks the authority to impose ‘net neutrality’ on internet providers like Comcast.”
Astroturfed Net Neutrality Letter Still Shrouded in Mystery [breitbart]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2516787/posts
“ ... pro-net neutrality letter supposedly written by Representative Jay Inslee (D-WA). ... In other words, they refuse to make the document public.” [snip]
Net Neutrality: A Tax on the Internet
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2510000/posts
From Banning Books to Banning Blogs
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2518087/posts
http://reason.com/archives/2010/05/18/from-banning-books-to-banning
Two snippets:
The Obama administration has announced plans to regulate the Internet through the Federal Communications Commission, extending its authority over broadband providers to police web traffic, enforcing “net neutrality.” [snip]
The bill, however, would radically redefine how the FEC regulates political commentary. A section of the DISCLOSE Act would exempt traditional media outlets from coordination regulations, but the exemption does not include bloggers, only “a communication appearing in a news story, commentary, or editorial distributed through the facilities of any broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine or other periodical publication…” [snip]
Leave Them Tubes Alone [Townhall.com ^ | May 21, 2010 | David Harsanyi]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2518091/posts
“In a 2001 interview (one that only recently has gone viral and caused a brouhaha), Cass Sunstein, now the nation’s regulatory czar, is overheard advocating for government to insist all websites offer opposing viewpoints — or, in other words, a “Fairness” Doctrine for the Web.”
[Sunstein added that they should be willing to mandate speech regulation. He later backed out because the internet was more complicated than he first thought. Others have not — one being justice nominee, Kagan the Wacko. Next about her.]
Please post 2 again without infowars links.