Replies

Go back to my first post to you and do try to stay on topic here.

I asked you a question. You responded by asking a question. I asked you to respond to the first question. You accused me of something in order to avoid answering the question.

Now you come back after searching the archives to again avoid answering the question.

Why do you not want to answer the question about why you posted what is essentially a local law enforcement issue?

Nice attempt at diversion but see if you can stay on task. It can't be that difficult for you, can it?

Why do you not want to answer the question about why you posted what is essentially a local law enforcement issue? Nice attempt at diversion but see if you can stay on task. It can't be that difficult for you, can it?

Sometimes I answer questions with a question, because, depending on the source & manner of the Q, that's the best way to handle it.

For example: Your claim that this is a mere "local issue". If it is, then did you likewise recognize the thread you posted in Oshkosh re: the 6 yo as a simple "local school principal jurisdiction issue"? (Yes or No? If not, why not?)

And indeed your history is relevant because from a cursory view, I'd like to see how consistent you are.