Show me where the article, as it exists now, says that the Germans annexed their former lands. This? “except for Alsace-Lorraine, a disputed territory which was placed under German administration (though not formally annexed).” Oops, no, that says the exact OPPOSITE of what your map does. (You can jump in and do a quick edit on the text, but that won’t make the annexation claim any more factual.)
The map is garbage, whatever language it is in.
And footnotes dealing with other aspects of the occupation are totally irrelevant. Point me to sources showing annexation.
Response:
From the Vichy France article, Overview:
From "Vichy's racial policies and collaboration"
"Natzweiler included a gas chamber which was used to exterminate at least 86 detainees (mostly Jewish) with the aim obtaining a collection of undamaged skeletons (as this mode of execution did no damage to the skeletons themselves) for the use of Nazi professor August Hirt."
And from this History of Alsace-Loraine:
From same Alsace-Lorraine article: World War II:
"About 130,000 young men from Alsace-Lorraine were also drafted or volunteered to serve in the German Wehrmacht or the Waffen-SS during the Second World War, mostly on the eastern front (40,000 of them were killed or missing in action).
This led to numerous problems and recriminations after the war.
The tong-term historical context here is that Alsace-Lorraine was annexed, un-annexed, re-annexed and re-un-annexed -- several times over the centuries.
The most recent annexation was by Germany in 1940, though some sources, instead of using the word "annexed," merely say it was "administered from Berlin."
Is there a practical distinction to be made between "annexed" and "administered from Berlin"?
Among the ways we can see that Nazis treated Alsace-Lorraine as their own territory include:
Finally, you seem to be highly sensitive to this particular word "annexed," and to any legalistic distinctions regarding it.
Can you explain why?