To: Hoosier-Daddy
Anyone care to integrate the volume of a shell with an initial circumference of 25,000 miles and a final circumference 12,000 feet above the initial circumference? That is a pot load of water.
20 posted on
04/26/2010 9:32:16 PM PDT by
Hoosier-Daddy
( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
To: Hoosier-Daddy
Anyone care to integrate the volume of a shell with an initial circumference of 25,000 miles and a final circumference 12,000 feet above the initial circumference? That is a pot load of water. The water wouldn't have to cover the entire globe to 12,000 feet above current sea level. It could have come as a tsunami, then subsided.
29 posted on
04/26/2010 9:50:54 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Hoosier-Daddy
Anyone care to integrate the volume of a shell with an initial circumference of 25,000 miles and a final circumference 12,000 feet above the initial circumference? That is a pot load of water. Actually, you have to go to 29,000 feet since EVERYTHING was submerged, which means Mt. Everest. I did it once, it ended up being about 30 TIMES the total water on the Earth and in the atmosphere right now. A few pot loads, I'd say!
48 posted on
04/26/2010 10:13:25 PM PDT by
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
To: Hoosier-Daddy; Windflier; PugetSoundSoldier
Ever heard of the hydroplate theory? Prior to the flood the earth was semi-arid with average 70 degree temps everywhere (including the poles) and mountain ranges no more than 1 mile high. Incidentally if you were to lower the sea-levels worldwide less than 100 feet all of the continents would be connected by land-bridges.
See creationscience.com written by a former evolutionary scientist Dr. Walt Brown Ph.D.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson