[Jack Hydrazine]

Leftists can’t tolerate any form of dissent and simply classify it as sedition by terrorists.

[dynachrome]

Example of a biased poll. "No" still winning.

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

[Red in Blue PA]

WTF is the choice of “this is the most ridiculous poll ever”?

[FrdmLvr]

Total Votes = 569
Yes, and they should be charged.
137 Votes, or 24.07 %
No, but they’re awfully close.
109 Votes, or 19.15 %
No. They’re exercising their free speech rights.
309 Votes, or 54.30 %
I’m not sure.
14 Votes, or 2.460 %

[Bringbackthedraft]

Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin rise to the level of sedition ................................. people with open minds may think so. That is people, with a really open mind, like empty space.

[freedumb2003]

>>Yes, and they should be charged.
137 Votes, or 23.33 %
No, but they’re awfully close.
112 Votes, or 19.08 %
No. They’re exercising their free speech rights.
324 Votes, or 55.19 %
I’m not sure.
14 Votes, or 2.385 %<<

The use of the word “sedition” by those on the left who have been practicing it for years is breathtaking in its hypocricy.

[Lucky9teen]

I voted and then got an network access error page...so I couldn’t see the results.

[mom-7]

Joe Klein, and chrissy the looney tunes.

[DManA]

My answer would be

No, in fact they are defending the country from people who are.

[avoth]

I wonder if they’ll ever have a poll on whether Obama and Company are traitors.

[ricmc2175]

Thanks

Do the speech and actions of Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin rise to the level of sedition?
Total Votes = 646
Yes, and they should be charged. 142 Votes, or 21.98 %
No, but they’re awfully close. 118 Votes, or 18.26 %
No. They’re exercising their free speech rights. 372 Votes, or 57.58 %
I’m not sure. 14 Votes, or 2.167 %

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

I thought dissent was patriotic.

[Voter62vb]

59%...

[ReneeLynn]

Well, someone should go ahead and charge them then. Can you imagine? Sarah up for sedition. Man, they do NOT want to go there.

[onyx]

Are those people in that state crazy?

- - - - -

Acts of sedition
Do the speech and actions of Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin rise to the level of sedition?

Total Votes = 694

Yes, and they should be charged.
148 Votes, or 21.32 %

No, but they’re awfully close.
121 Votes, or 17.43 %

No. They’re exercising their free speech rights.
411 Votes, or 59.22 %

I’m not sure.
14 Votes, or 2.017 %

[humblegunner]

The actual title: Do the speech and actions of Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin rise to the level of sedition?

Note the correct capitalization of proper names.

[GOPJ]

From a DTogo vanity:

Tea Party rallies: thousands

Tea Party participants: millions

Tea Party squabbles with Law Enforcement: 0

Tea Parties confronted by riot police: 0

Tea Parties dispersed by tear gas: 0

Tea Party arrests: 0

Tea Parties causing violence/injuries: 0

Tea Parties causing property damage: 0

Tea Parties responsible for the death of anybody: 0

[bmwcyle]

Yes, and they should be charged.
159 Votes, or 21.11 %
No, but they’re awfully close.
127 Votes, or 16.86 %
No. They’re exercising their free speech rights.
453 Votes, or 60.15 %
I’m not sure where my brain is, if I ever had one.
14 Votes, or 1.859 %

[gunsequalfreedom]

Headline asks the wrong question. It is irrelevent if it is seditious. We have the right to be seditious in our speech. Better headline would be, "Do liberals making a big deal out of disatisfaction with the government not have the slightest clue that criticism of the government is legal, right and proper?"

OK, a little long for a headline...

[gunsequalfreedom]

Yes, and they should be charged.
166 Votes, or 20.21 %

No, but they’re awfully close.
136 Votes, or 16.56 %

No. They’re exercising their free speech rights.
505 Votes, or 61.51 %

I’m not sure.
14 Votes, or 1.705 %

Scarry is that 36% would consider curtailing free speech - although I’m sure same respondents see nothing wrong with burning the U.S. flag.