Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AussieJoe
I’m not sure that is the case. If it were then the gravitational force between the sun and planets wouldn’t be perpendicular to their orbits but have a component opposing their motion.

So you're saying gravity acts as if it were a rigid "arm" that connects two bodies, as opposed to something that propagates through the intervening space between them? i.e., like flying cars in an amusement park ride physically attached to the rotating mechanism at the center?

29 posted on 04/13/2010 6:07:06 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: ETL
The speed of gravity is faster than the speed of light.

If that were not the case, then black holes would not be able to capture and bend light.

31 posted on 04/13/2010 6:18:10 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

“So you’re saying gravity acts as if it were a rigid “arm” that connects two bodies, as opposed to something that propagates through the intervening space between them? i.e., like flying cars in an amusement park ride physically attached to the rotating mechanism at the center?”

I think that’s a good analogy.

Gravity seems to be a property of matter, like a field of mutual attraction that surrounds all matter in proportion to its static mass, so that there’s nothing that actually ‘travels’ as such but is always present.


35 posted on 04/13/2010 9:14:19 AM PDT by AussieJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson