Of course, maybe unwittingly, the show’s writers have displayed the absolute shallowness of liberals. Baranski’s character is in search of a meaningful relationship. She finds an opposite, but similarly talented prospect in Garry Cole’s ballistics analyst. He is conservative, Republican, individualist, but is willing to look past his political differences because he sees something in Baranski he likes. She sees the same in him, but is unwilling to look past his political leanings. And liberals claim to be more human and compassionate. The show’s writers make the right’s argument for us.
My husband and I really like this show. We stopped watching Law and Order because it is pretty much Democrat talking points.
This show, however, seems to deal more with crime than politics. Also, the political elements show the dirty Chicago politics—I think that belongs to the Democrats right now.
The Garry Cole character is a quite attractive conservative. It was funny to see Baranski’s character acting like a school girl around him, telling him she couldn’t compromise her principles and then going to bed with him.
“Of course, maybe unwittingly, the show’s writers have displayed the absolute shallowness of liberals. “
Mrs. Crusher and I love the show because it is intelligent, extremely well written, and often witty without being silly. IMHO the writers are purposely showing the shallowness of liberalism through Baranski’s character. The criticisms (mostly implied, sometimes overt) of Obama’s Chicago and the endemic corruption of the ruling cabal of Democrats is refreshingly new on drama television.
Sure, they regularly snipe at Sarah (good grief, given her prominence in today’s world they would be foolish not to) but that pales in comparison to the broadsides they have been sending at libtards. The show is a pretty stark exploration of integrity and the consequences of corruption. No wonder the libtards look so bad.