Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

And the lunacy continues ...
1 posted on 04/10/2010 10:31:17 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

That does leave the door open for the AG’s to file a second lawsuit questioning Obamacare because of the President’s eligibility.

Though I suspect Obama’s popularity would have to continue to fall for at least another 6 months to a year before they would consider such a course.


2 posted on 04/10/2010 10:36:47 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

What lunacy?
The Obama Presidency you mean?


3 posted on 04/10/2010 10:37:20 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Yeah, where’s the, “Geez, not this **** again?” sign when you need it?


4 posted on 04/10/2010 10:47:01 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

10 posted on 04/10/2010 11:33:05 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
You say "The lunacy continues"

Welll...... maybe so.

However, it seems like the woman who would not stop knocking on the door of the judge all night, wanting justice for her case (in a parable told by Jesus). Eventually, he gave in just to get her to stop, even though he did not care about the issue of justice per se.

I admire very much her use of a judge's ruling (the wording of which) implies that she has standing. Its not clear to me if she is using the wording on the same case or a different one, but she just won't give up.

I am inclined to agree that in the court of public opinion, she is not good for the conservative movement, or the "natural born citizen" movement.

However, the court of public opinion means very little. It takes no notice of judicial malfeasance so far. It ridicules people who are doing the right thing no matter what. It threatens prosecution, and carries out retaliation on those who seek the truth.

My co-workers have decided long ago that Obama is eligible and anyone who says otherwise simply either 1. hates blacks, or 2. has a spiteful difference of politics motivating them. "Besides" they say, "He is president now... what would you have done?"

One case. One judge. Traction. Thats all that is needed.

I know her chances are small. (They were from the beginning.) And I know that her antics have not won any points with judges. But --based on the caliber of legal review in the courts so far -- she did not have much to lose by pursuing this persistently.

Just food for thought.

Which of us by worrying can change the slightest thing about our lives? Yet that is my main political activity, that is, just after staying informed, and closely followed by prayer.

Who has been as fervent and diligent in the defense of our country as Orly? I suggest that because she has lived in a country without the freedoms and privelages we have here, she values them more highly.

James Manning is a little nutty, I think.

Glen Beck --in my opinion-- has made a compromise in order to continue to exert a positive influence.

Sean Hannity's show last night in New Orleans was practically un-watchable due to the crowd noise.

Bill O'Reilly, still top of the ratings, can really be a pinhead himself sometimes.

Rush Limbaugh lost a lot of credibility with liberals due to his use/abuse of prescription painkillers.

And yet, all of them together are starting to sound the same alarm, it seems. "We must all hang together or we shall surely all hang separately", so to speak.

Orly has trouble communicating. I think English may not be her second language, but 3rd or 4th.... She is no dummy.

Last question (grin) Doesn't your family have a nutty aunt that people love in spite of how she acts?

11 posted on 04/10/2010 11:37:20 AM PDT by txnuke (Obama votes "PRES__ENT" because he has no ID.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Strictly speaking on the legal merits, without going into my opinion of the case in general, there are 2 things that pop out.

1)Vinson(?) protected himself by relying upon “discretion.”

2) The “quo warranto” judge will rush his decision up to chop out the underlying claim.

parsy, who finds this obvious


18 posted on 04/10/2010 12:16:05 PM PDT by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

What is it with Orly that she can’t take ‘no’ for an answer?


20 posted on 04/10/2010 12:50:45 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Wow.

I have to say that we're getting to the point where Orly is not even funny anymore.

It's like watching seventeen straight hours of Monty Python.

Eventually you just can't believe anyone could do this.

26 posted on 04/10/2010 1:58:20 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Go Orly go!

Are you saying that Barry’s Presidency is a lunacy?


35 posted on 04/10/2010 3:49:41 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson