Ol Woof Blister is the best propagandist since the Nazi Joseph Goebbels.
CNN is decent for some things, like their science section is pretty good. I’d say though if you were looking to pay money for a subscription to something, get the Wall Street Journal instead, or maybe BusinessWeek. BusinessWeek has gotten better since Bloomberg has bought them.
I trust them to lie.
I only go to CNN when there is some sort of emergency incident or, disaster, either nationwide or worldwide, ie, airline crash, severe weather, mass shooting, or some such .
Their on-scene coverage is good since they have so many field reporters all over the world.
Otherwise FOX is my primary news source.
They don’t call it the “Commie News Network” for nuttin’!
Remember a poll a month or so ago that said Fox is now #1 most trusted name in news. I believe :)
In a word, “NO,” they are not to be trusted.
CNN isn't distrusted because of what they report; CNN is distrusted because of what they omit.
No..
CNN is an agenda driven organization. Essentially a propaganda organ of the Democratic party. How often do you ever hear criticism of liberal goals, outcomes or policies? Virtually never.
Leaving bias aside for the moment, I don’t trust any of them to give me accurate information. Towards the end of the healthcare debate it was hard to find a reporter who understood that once the House voted for the Senate bill, it was going to POTUS for signature regardless of what did or did not happen to reconciliation. In another timely example of inaccurate reporting, FNC just told me three different times that the Tea Party rally in Searchlight was mere yards away from Interstate 95.
I would be careful with a term such as “trust”, that implies “belief”, which should never be given unless a proven track record has been established.
Money Magazine should be considered entertainment as it is always at least a week behind current events, CNN sort of abandoned their “news’ effort years ago and now offers viewpoint reporting, which is fine...as long as one shares their viewpoint.
Simple answer: NO.
I do not trust any "news" source to be completely objective. CNN is known to have a substantial leftist slant. I will occasionally read a CNN report but I do so knowing I will be receiving information with the left slant.
You been living under a rock pal???????
Hell no. Next question?
No, I’d sooner trust an AIDS-infected hooker who tells me she’s a virgin though..
No
Not only no but HELL NO!!!
No doubt it's great if one wants to hear the Democrat talking points of the day.
NO
NO.
They can cover international events for awhile until they all fall over themselves trying to interview the dying man lying on the street in front of them. Then they go to pieces. Of course, no one, not even a cameraman, appears to give him food, water or a damp cloth on his forehead.