Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Borges

No it doesn’t. As a guy that straddles a similar line as Ebert (though I’m not patient with the SERIOUS arthouse movies) I know that many of the great fun films simply have no artistic merit. I love me some Toxic Avenger but there is no art in those movies, there was no art within line of site while they were making those movies, they’re fun, but they’re retarded. And that’s how it is with a lot of the low budget silly movies, and truthfully that’s part of the fun, a lot of those movies are deliberately non-artful. They come from a time before VCRs, they were disposable movies, to be watched once at your local grindhouse and forgotten.


50 posted on 03/25/2010 10:13:30 AM PDT by discostu (wanted: brick, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

You could say that about a lot of films made by the Hollywood studios in the 1930s and 1940s. Povery Row made films like Detour which are now revered. In the Postmodern age everything has a highbrow defender.


51 posted on 03/25/2010 10:18:48 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson