Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark

Maybe it is the camera angle but the four engines appear to be tucked in really close to the fuselage, as compared to later heavy bombers. There is a lot of wing outboard of the engines.


12 posted on 03/23/2010 9:50:39 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Homer_J_Simpson

“Maybe it is the camera angle but the four engines appear to be tucked in really close to the fuselage, as compared to later heavy bombers. There is a lot of wing outboard of the engines.”

I’m by no means an aeronautical engineer, but my guess is that it was considered necessary to save weight. Having the engines closer to the fuselage meant shorter weight bearing lateral struts in the wing assembly.

The B19 is a different configuration than the B29, where the engines were out farther on the wing. But that configuration, and the plane itself, would not have been possible without the supercharged engines which were not available in 1940. With the lack of engine power, I’m going to bet that saving weight in the airframe was considered very important to get this big bird + payload off the ground.


18 posted on 03/23/2010 11:56:57 AM PDT by henkster (A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson