Good Idea, we could vote for the anti Palin Democrats instead.
So we’re going to become like the Dems and brand everybody that doesn’t agree on a certain candidate?
Palin endorsed John McCain over conservative JD Hayworth.
Playing the sex card just like O-bots played the race card.
Figures.
But hey, I could expect nothing less from love-struck pawns crying out desperately for a Messiah, a Savior, a Caesar, regardless of which side of the aisle the pawns hail from.
People like you are really dangerous. You are so insecure about your own beliefs that you want to go after everyone who might have a different opinion.
I don't support abortion, I have no issue with evangelicals as long as they don't push their dogma on me or try to use government to usurp other people's freedoms and I would vote for a woman like Maggie Thatcher if she was on the ballot.
I don't see what the big fuss over her is. But maybe I am a troll for wanting something more than "You betcha" in the WH.
I haven’t heard my chosen congressional candidate mention her.
OFF WITH HIS HEAD!!!
How about those who like Palin as a TV personality, but not CIC.
More baloney from the palinista wing of FR
I'm a lady and I support Mitt Romney, and that's not me.
Reagon’s eleventh commandment. “Don’t speak ill of fellow Republicans.”
Well it would certainly be helpful if she wasn’t fundraising for McCain.
She is not a declared candidate yet. What if she doe not run?
So you think it is a good idea to put the cart before the horse?
I agree
There is yet another version of anti-Palin Republican - one who considers the position of office to be an "elite position," best suited to people who belong to the same class of folk that either went to school with one another (at least the "best" schools or belongs to all the "right" organizations (a membership in the CFR certainly gives one the "right outlook" on politics and world government, for instance.)
Very few of our last few Presidents didn't belong to the CFR, Reagan comes to mind. The "in" people in both parties belong and they feel somewhat kindly to their fellow members and feel everyone else just "doesn't understand the role of the President" or "wouldn't be accepted by foreign leaders" (what they truly feel is that everyone else is an "outsider" and needs to stay that way.)
I discriminate against those who agree with or support socialist sympathizing politicians like Romney and McAmnesty.
I happen to be one of the Bad News Bears.
I am sexist because I think she should be at home raising her kids and taking care of her family. I know how completely wrong of me. I should sell her family values down the river in order to help the party. I suppose there has to be someones family to sacrifice for my parties agenda??
Very likable.
Great personal story.
Makes the right enemies.
But that's just about it.
Try and imagine Palin holding her own on the issues in the same way as a Paul Ryan or a Mitch Daniels or (evening up the genders) a Virginia Postrel or a Laura Ingraham.
'Cos I can't.
I happen to support Sarah, but what you just did goes across the line. We have enough trouble fighting the cult of Obama without forming a cult of Sarah.
If you believe in her, then she doesn't need arm twisting or thug tactics.
She’s not our answer. Trashing her isn’t the answer either. She’d make a good Secretary of State, but she is not WH material IMHO.
A lot of folks believe that the candidate they support is better than Sarah for one reason or another; that’s their right. But they should be pointing out their candidate’s virtues, not bashing Sarah.
And I don’t consider comparing candidates’ credentials and policies bashing, so long as it done honestly and fairly.