The 2010 Census claims it's only 10 questions.
From Debbie’s site a poster had this video about how to take the Census with the hilarious Christopher Walken.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XtuPvwBa2U
And here is the stupidest reasoning for one of the questions in the current census:
Question 5: “Please provide information for each person living here. Start with a person here who owns or rents this house, apartment, or mobile home. If the owner or renter lives somewhere else, start with any adult living here. This will be Person 1. What is Person 1’s name?”
Reason claimed for this question:
“Listing the name of each person in the household helps the respondent to include all members, particularly in large households where a respondent may forget who was counted and who was not.”
They must be thinking about a house where 30 illegal aliens are hiding — I am sure they will be filling out the census form. (/sarc)
I received a notice today I will receive the census in one week. They waste taxpayers money with one piece of mail informing me about another piece of mail and the last part informing people of their website was written in five languages other than English!
I mean...WTF?
They could find themselves on an internet site...Census Workers to watch out for...
They can’t get to my door without scaling a 7 foot gate. I will answer only those questions I see fit to answer, and that might even be zero. Eff everything the Obama admin does.
“The census worker even put a copy of ‘the law’ in her mailbox...”
Am I correct in suggesting that if the census worker “put” (not mailed) something in her mailbox, that the census worker could be charged for tampering with the property of the U.S. Mail? (the mailbox itself) After all, the census worker is not a postal worker.
Last time I went the other way.
I wrote 33 Hispanics and 6 African-Americans
lived in my small 3BR house with an income
of $23.50 per year.
We have 19 cars, but walk to work.
Four teens in the house were pregnant, but
all were getting abortions next week.
We are 9 years late on our rent to the white
Catholic landlord.
We live very well on the food stamp program
as 13 of us have 3 social security numbers
the others only have two (slackers).
15 are HS dropouts, but selling crack, powder,
and pot is steady work. Crackers love the
powder.
Oops, somebody just popped a cap in Sancho,
so make that 32 Hispanics.
I never heard back. Just a normal SoCal family.
We WANT this state to lose as many Congressional districts as possible.
That is almost as horrible as what they had to put up with in Cambodia, what with the death squads, the mass murder, the enslavement, the killing fields.
Sounds like it was harrowing and terrible, I hope they got through it all.
What authority does the government have to do anything more than a head count? I haven’t seen such in the Constitution. But that is just a “living document” that can be “moulded” to fit the circumstances (aka - agenda) of the current administration.
All the government “needs” to know - how many people live here? Period. Anything more is a violation of privacy.
Ms. Schlussel & Mr. Day are talking like one of those whacked-out Ron Paul supporters now. They know good & well that you have nothing to fear about the census unless you have something to hide.
What are you trying to hide, Jerry? < / sarc >
THE 2010 CENSUS - How much information are you really required to give?
I plan to say how many and for the future geneologist I probably will give name, gender how many. BUT before I will talk to anyone I plan to ask them to fill out this info on them:
http://freedomlaw.com/PSQuestn.html
This is 2 pages about of their info, if they make it thru my questions (and show ID to prove it) then I will tell them two people live here. I doubt many would come back for the invasion of their privacy.
I will try to remember to record this and have my Constitution handy too.