Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagle Eye

Still, would you want to wager against it? That’s the point. She unnecessarily endangered that cop’s life.


44 posted on 03/08/2010 12:20:29 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: James C. Bennett
She unnecessarily endangered that cop’s life.

Prove it.

First there is nothing that indicates she had any communicable disease. Nothing that I've seen anyway. Perhaps something you saw?

Second, even needlesticks with known infected blood rarely transmit HIV, so yeah, I'd take the bet that a squirt of breast milk isn't going to transmit HIV.

48 posted on 03/08/2010 12:26:17 PM PST by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

I would bet my life that it is statistically irrelevant, to contract AIDS through anything but blood to blood contact. It may not even be virus caused, the studies simply have not been done. Nobody has injected HIV into healthy humans to see if they develop AIDS? It is unproven, and deaths from AIDS are virtually unheard of in this country, as opposed to when they killed people with AZT. I remember when doctors, dentists and nurses were afraid of working on patients with AIDS. It turns out that Hepatitis in its various forms is much more dangerous and deadly.


59 posted on 03/08/2010 12:42:36 PM PST by runninglips (Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson