Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Not lookin' for rants--just wondering if this is a scenario that would work until the law itself could be repealed.
1 posted on 03/04/2010 7:45:06 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper

Sure all you need is money ... But it will be only the courts who get overloaded. Doubtful that will effect Obama, only his dodomayor will suffer.


2 posted on 03/04/2010 7:47:12 AM PST by Tarpon ( ...Rude crude socialist Obama depends on ignorance to force his will on people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

You’d have to show cause, and that wouldn’t be until 2014. :(


3 posted on 03/04/2010 7:48:16 AM PST by Palter (Kilroy was here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Yes, and no.

A lawsuit itself (no matter how many are filed, or for what cause) cannot stop implementation unless the Court issues an injunction pending litigation. No amount of lawyer-issued activity can stop a law.

But, an injunction would be able to halt implementation of the law pending litigation. You’d need a sympathetic judge with the authority and inclination to injoin.

SnakeDoc


4 posted on 03/04/2010 7:48:32 AM PST by SnakeDoctor (Do you know if the hotel is pager friendly? [...] I'm not getting a sig on my beeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

That’s why I suggested Obama left the Supremes off the invite list for the Health Care (blame the Republicans) Summit. Obama needed to have them there to co-opt them on the Constitutional issues - Chicago style.


5 posted on 03/04/2010 7:49:14 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Liberal nutzo lawsuits go forward.
Conservative lawsuits get summarily thrown out. (Ask birthers.)


7 posted on 03/04/2010 7:53:31 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (IN A SMALL TENT WE JUST STAND CLOSER! * IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Or you could file one very good case.

Just a thought.


8 posted on 03/04/2010 7:54:48 AM PST by MrRobertPlant2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

There is a risk in losing and setting a precedent that could impact other potential cases. Instead of a shotgun approach, it should be a very defined, calculated approach with the best case possible.


9 posted on 03/04/2010 7:54:51 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I think we are on the same page, but the 10th amendment argument is that the federal govt does not have the authority to mandate some issue that is within the control of the state governments.

But I am not sure that mandated healthcare is constitutional even on a state level.

You cannot mandate that someone receive healthcare, period, if it is against their religious beliefs. If you can’t make someone receive medical care, how can you make them pay for something that they will never even receive? It makes no sense, defies any logic.

I have long argued that there is mandated healthcare, complete with a tax penalty for those who did not participate, is unconstitutional.

It looks like certain state legislatures agree. See this entry from Wiki.

National Health Care Nullification – As of March 2010[update], 25 states have introduced legislation which would declare certain provisions of any proposed national health care bill to be null and void within the state; the legislation passed in Arizona and Virginia.[11] Such provisions include mandatory participation in such a system as well as preserving the right of a patient to pay a health care professional for treatment (and for the professional to accept it) outside of a single-payer system. Arizona’s legislation passed as a proposed constitutional amendment, to be submitted to the voters in 2010.[12] On February 1, 2010, the Virginia Senate took a stand against a key provision of a proposed federal health care overhaul, passing legislation declaring that Virginia residents cannot be forced to buy health insurance.

But the problem is that until that matter was settled, you are subject to civil and criminal penalties, (criminal penalties, including jail time), for not participating. So the practicality of the matter is that you will have to participate until it is judicially determined.

This is so far beyond the American ideology it is incredible. It is more soviet, more feudal, than anything this country has seen. They have taken a political issue, and turned it into a criminal statute where if you oppose it you go to jail.


10 posted on 03/04/2010 7:57:30 AM PST by job
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I hope doctors and people who can do it, just do it


11 posted on 03/04/2010 8:02:34 AM PST by GeronL (Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I truly don’t understand why there is not an outright tax revolt. They are sweating right now with the revenues down, imagine if millions did not file? Really, what do you think they could do? Are there that many IRS agents? That much court time? Do they truly have that many lawyers? WE could put the screws to them in a minute.


12 posted on 03/04/2010 8:30:57 AM PST by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

IIRC you must be able to show “injury” which can’t happen until the law is actually implemented ....


13 posted on 03/04/2010 8:33:17 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Michael Savage says we could use the religious angle with which to sue the government. But we can’t all become Christian Scientists! Aren’t there rites and/or ceremonies that one must do, in order to officially take on a new religion? I don’t think they would appreciate their religion being *used* for that purpose. I also heard that the Amish are to be excluded from the health care bill. (Is that true?) We can’t all become Amish!


18 posted on 03/04/2010 9:56:00 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners!!! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail!!! Welcome to our Totalitarian world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
and:
23 posted on 03/04/2010 6:20:52 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson