You can say it all day long, but that’s just worthless internet chatter.
Go find proof. Note: missing evidence is not evidence.
You’ve got to find substantial proof before you make charges, otherwise we all get to look like fools because you were getting your jollies from the fact that the internet lets anyone say anything at any time.
Yeah, documents are missing. Hey, we all get that. That’s not news.
It doesn’t help our cause, though.
Go find physical evidence, and stop shouting the most radical, random thoughts.
I’m posting a blog quote, and consistent with his HLR photoshopped picture, it calls for more investigation.
No reason to fake a shot, unless it’s all a fake.
You need to read more Arthur Connan Doyle, if you think that. Haven't you heard of the dog that didn't bark?
While I will concede that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, the amount of dissimilation, attempts at deception, and the sealing of records by Executive Order in an administration which promised "Transparency" are cause for questioning those records and the information they are claimed to contain.
Surely, the President of the United States should not mind verifying his Constitutional Eligibility, especially when the documents required are no more than any child attending school must produce, nor any American citizen must show to get a passport.
It brooks no faith in the leadership in Washington when they cannot resolve such a simple matter, and the remainder of the actions (governmental, economic, social, etc.) really cause one to question just where Mr. Obama's loyalties lie. Certainly not with the Republic, save to bankrupt and destroy it.
Which leads us back to the question of whether or not he is COnstitutionally qualified.
When you apply for a job, you have to state and often provide access to evidence of your qualifications. Your background is checked, your driving and any criminal record, your credit record, and pretty much anything about you, including former employers.
Well, we've been asking about Mr. Obama's background since well before he was shoved into this position he has, and continuing to look (especially with his job performance) at his past just might succeed in uncovering a serious mistake in personnel and staffing before it is too late to remedy it.
The absence of documents verifying his claims to be qualified for the position would be cause for concern in any Human Resources Department, all the more so because he has the 'football' at his beck and call.