Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Enquirer: GRAND JURY TO INDICT EDWARDS
National Enquirer ^ | March 3, 2010 | National Enquirer

Posted on 03/03/2010 10:50:37 AM PST by Beaten Valve

The ultimate fall from grace, a Federal grand jury is about to indict John Edwards, The ENQUIRER has learned exclusively.

In another shocker, close sources say Edwards' estranged wife Elizabeth could help send the former presidential candidate to jail!

Edwards, the disgraced two-time Presidential loser, is being investigated by the feds, including the FBI and IRS, for possible campaign violations related to paying his mistress Rielle Hunter.

The grand jury has been meeting since April 2009, and insiders say an indictment is imminent.

"John is terrified that he's going to be indicted," a friend told The ENQUIRER.

"While he believes he's done nothing illegal in trying to hide his extramarital affair with Rielle and their daughter, he thinks the Feds are going to make an example of him."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: elizabethedwards; johnedwards; nationalenquirer; riellehunter; saintelizabeth; stelizabeth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Farmer Dean

Edwards will never run again so I doubt that.


21 posted on 03/03/2010 10:58:14 AM PST by South40 ("Islam has a long tradition of tolerance." ~Hussein Obama, June 4, 2009, Cairo, Egypt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: South40

[Could be one of Zero’s first pardons.]

Yes, and the media will get Obama a pass by saying it all about sex.


22 posted on 03/03/2010 10:58:28 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: astounded

yeah the guy Rolling Stone(d) once gushed over as “The
Real Liberal”

>>If he weren’t rich, handsome and so well married, you might feel a little sorry for John Edwards. Never before in the 231-year history of our republic have the inalienable traits that Edwards possesses — his fair skin and a Y chromosome — been anything but a prerequisite for presidential politics. Today, his race and gender stand a chance of derailing his campaign altogether...But counting Edwards out would be a big mistake. Flying below the radar, the former vice-presidential candidate is pulling off a feat that Democratic consultants have long considered impossible: staking out the most progressive platform among the viable candidates while preserving an aura of electability.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/15825410/the_real_liberal


23 posted on 03/03/2010 10:58:33 AM PST by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

Elizabeth is getting the ultimate ex-wife revenge. Sue him for all he’s worth, help put him in jail. Hope she lives to see him behind bars.


24 posted on 03/03/2010 10:58:39 AM PST by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

bttt


25 posted on 03/03/2010 11:00:40 AM PST by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

Yup. Hillary is next.


26 posted on 03/03/2010 11:01:08 AM PST by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

John Edwards...NY Governor Dave Patterson...Charlie Wrangle...maybe they can reserve a cell block just for Dems.


27 posted on 03/03/2010 11:03:00 AM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

The BIG secret is out of the bag as mainstream media trumpets the historic news that the NATIONAL ENQUIRER has been accepted into the Pulitzer Prize competition for its exhaustive investigation of the John Edwards Conspiracy and Cover-Up.

The scoop was broken by Emily Miller at Huffington Post as rumors of our acceptance into the competition by the prestigious journalism committee ignited the blogosphere.

“The Pulitzer Prize Board has officially accepted The National Enquirer’s submissions for breaking the John Edwards scandal, according to sources close to the Board. In a historic move, the Pulitzer Board conceded that the self-proclaimed tabloid is qualified to compete with mainstream news outlets for journalism’s most prestigious prize.

“The Enquirer is in the running for the Pulitzer in two categories: “Investigative Reporting” and “National News Reporting” for The National Enquirer staff,” Ms. Miller announced exclusively at HuffPo.

Quickly The New York Times - for many THE Paper of record - made it even more official with their elegant headline: “Enquirer Is Eligible for Pulitzer”. Writer Richard Perez-Pena analyzed the Pulitzer committee’s turn-around in accepting the ENQUIRER entry after initially dismissing the very notion.

The Times reported: Sig Gissler, administrator of the prizes, says he and his colleagues never publicly discuss the eligibility of any specific publication. “We apply our criteria, and if publications meet them, we allow them to participate.”

But with a grassroots effort steamrolling the viral landscape, Gawker.com analyzed the situation point by point in their historic article: “There’s NO Good Reason the National Enquirer Shouldn’t Win a Pulitzer Prize”

And MediaBistro even has a poll (yes, you can vote in it) on whether or not the Pulitzer Committee should award The ENQUIRER investigation into John Edwards’ alleged abuse of campaign funds to fund a conspiracy of silence:

Ms. Miller concluded in her Huffington Post exclusive: “The massive grassroots campaign by the public to push the Pulitzer Board to recognize the national importance of The Enquirer’s reporting of John Edwards shows the best of Americans’ core values - hard work, fairness and equality for all - even for tabloids.”


28 posted on 03/03/2010 11:03:06 AM PST by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: at bay

If he had any guts or honor he’d Admiral Borda himself.


29 posted on 03/03/2010 11:04:17 AM PST by gatorhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

And they haven’t been wrong yet about this scumbag.


30 posted on 03/03/2010 11:04:52 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

Silky Pony will make someone a nice play toy like Big Bart...


31 posted on 03/03/2010 11:06:16 AM PST by MaxMax (Conservatism isn't a party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

The Enquirer is reliable.

Edwards needs to be charged.


32 posted on 03/03/2010 11:08:07 AM PST by 1Swashbuckler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve
I'll be interested to see the tax charges. They will be far more serious if they are brought than the campaign finance matters. Its pretty hard to move that much money around in secret without creating a lot of tax liabilities, violating information return requirements and reporting rules. Gross income includes all money from whatever source unless excluded by a code section. A gift is only a gift if made with detached and disinterested generosity. So, when Edwards gives a bunch of money to his now deceased lawyer pal, was that income? Where's the gift? It was intended for Riell so it can have been a gift to the lawyer pal. Then when the lawyer pal gives the money to Riell, is that a gift? Where's the gift tax return? Is there really detached and disinterested generosity?
If they wanted to, there could be a lot of charges.
33 posted on 03/03/2010 11:10:11 AM PST by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

This news is actually posted on Huff-N-Puff this AM:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/03/john-edwards-indicted-gra_n_484200.html?ref=twitter


34 posted on 03/03/2010 11:10:50 AM PST by Beaten Valve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

If the Enquirer keeps breaking stories with real substance and truth they will certainly increase market share over the Leftist newsprint rags.


35 posted on 03/03/2010 11:11:07 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anton

If Edwards was acting in concert with his lawyer to move money around then I believe that would constitute RICO charges...


36 posted on 03/03/2010 11:12:54 AM PST by Beaten Valve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

Walkin’ through the Big Yard, whistling “I Feel Pretty”.


37 posted on 03/03/2010 11:13:22 AM PST by Random Access
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

They still make up junk; however, I am more curious as to who is after this man?


38 posted on 03/03/2010 11:14:37 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy. What a slimeball John Edwards is.


39 posted on 03/03/2010 11:26:48 AM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

He’ll make a nice prison wife


40 posted on 03/03/2010 11:40:08 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson