[C19fan]

This is coming up because the NCAA can walk away from the current contract with CBS and the expanded tournament would serve to get a bigger contract. I would boycott the first round of the expanded tournament. This really is a sop to the BCS conferences so their second to last member can get it if it has an above .500 record.

[oust the louse]

they need to keep this at 64 teams PERIOD. Don’t mess with perfection.

[rsobin]

If they expand the field to 400 teams North Carolina might make it.

[KarlInOhio]

You are already down to the teams which have no chance to win. Just imagine adding 31 teams worse than Alabama State (last year's play-in game loser). All I expect it would do is shake up the 9-16 seeds and tire them out a little so they are less likely to beat a 1-8 seed team in the new second round.

[denydenydeny]

As Whitney Houston would say, Hell to the no.

The symmetry of the 64 teams is perfect. The only thing in sports that would be worse is adding a 33rd team to the NFL.

[dinoparty]

I’m sure I’m in the minority but I think its already too big. I think all conference winners should make it plus some of the very best second-place teams, but that’s it. If you can’t even be in the top 2 of your conference you don’t deserve a shot at the National Title. Moreover, do away with the conference tournaments.

[discostu]

They shouldn’t, but they will. Everybody wants mo money.

[Yossarian]

It’s nice to see the NCAA once again looking out for college student’s education by giving them yet another game to practice for and perform in.

The NCAA Division I revenue-generating sports get many youth, primarily African-Americans, to toil away full-time for free, for someone else’s profit. Sound familiar?

[political1]

Go UAB Blazers