Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Someone was overheard asking if those were falsettos. /sarc.
1 posted on 03/01/2010 9:11:39 AM PST by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeStatement

No photos please!!!


2 posted on 03/01/2010 9:16:35 AM PST by JimmyMc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

If you’re gonna make it big as an artiste, you gotta have a gimmick, wrapping landmarks in cellophane, sliced cows in formaldehyde, photographing weimaraners in fancy dress, etc.


3 posted on 03/01/2010 9:17:30 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

Without seeing the pictures, I bet those are not the same 5200 nude Australians I would have picked for a photo shoot.


4 posted on 03/01/2010 9:17:43 AM PST by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

Wow.

PT Barnum was right.


5 posted on 03/01/2010 9:18:27 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement
It was difficult to get the straight normal participants to embrace the gay perverted participants...." Tunick said.

And the truly nauseating part is that this clown can't understand *why* that was the case.

7 posted on 03/01/2010 9:19:34 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement
"It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa,"

Right. We know how reserved and shy those gays are. (eyes rolling)

Tunick, who is known for his nude group photos in public spaces, posed participants for more than an hour in a variety of positions.

It's called porn.

11 posted on 03/01/2010 9:26:11 AM PST by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement
"It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa,"

Gross.


12 posted on 03/01/2010 9:26:31 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Our politicians are stupid and our policies unsustainable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

Throw another bare ass on the barbie.....


13 posted on 03/01/2010 9:29:24 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975; Aussie Dasher; myknowledge
Ping
16 posted on 03/01/2010 9:35:22 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement
straight participants to embrace the gay participants

If I had to guess, the problem was more getting straights to embrace people of the same sex, and gays to embrace people of the opposite sex.

19 posted on 03/01/2010 9:50:55 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

“It was difficult to get the straight participants to embrace the gay participants and vice versa,”.....

I hope they have Bareasspalooza in front of the White House when it comes to the U.S.!


20 posted on 03/01/2010 10:03:15 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement
30 Helens Agree: Nudity turns them on.

30 Helens Agree.

27 posted on 03/01/2010 10:08:43 AM PST by Lazamataz (Seriously. The only way Obama can possibly pull this out is to declare Martial Law before November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: windcliff

ping


51 posted on 03/01/2010 12:21:05 PM PST by stylecouncilor (What Would Jim Thompson Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson