Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/24/2010 1:42:59 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cindy
Folks have forgotten what Terrorists are. They are folks who kill civilians. This includes men, women and children just like you and me. If they have been caught, their counterparts want to know how and how to avoid being caught.

They also want sympathy for their cause.

Since they violate the Geneva Convention in all of this, They should be accorded no rights and enjoy the hangmans noose after a military tribunal.

2 posted on 02/24/2010 1:55:49 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

geez ... in 1942, if you were caught talking to a German Soldier, you would have been hanged or shot.

If I was getting phone calls from someone in a known terrorist area,.. you better HOPE they’re keeping an eye on me and an ear on my phone.


3 posted on 02/24/2010 2:15:33 AM PST by gwilhelm56 (OBAMA ... Orwell's 1984 was a WARNING ... NOT a TEXTBOOK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

I am protected under the first ammendment, so long as I have my thumb in an open bullet wound, on said terrorist.

So long as I cause extreme pain and gain useful information it is acceptable.

The only caveat is apparently you cannot feed them chocolate or truffles, that would be violation of federal crime and further subject you to interpol


4 posted on 02/24/2010 2:40:56 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy
"Can the government forbid you from talking with terrorists? The Supreme Court heard arguments in an antiterrorism case presenting this First Amendment issue. The War on Terror just met the Bill of Rights, and now the justices need to sort them out.

This is a disingenuous way of phrasing the question. It's not about "talking" with the evil terrorists who want to murder or enslave every free person in the world. We talk with terrorists during waterboarding, and that's okay with those in government who support that method of questioning. It's about talking with terrorists to provide support for their evil actions. So the real question is about conspiracy and support for a criminal conspiracy.

5 posted on 02/24/2010 3:17:49 AM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy
"This is the first opportunity that the Supreme Court
will have to put its imprimatur on post-9/11 domestic
counter-terrorism enforcement.
More than anything else, this case represents an opportunity
for the court to declare that all support given to
terrorist groups is fungible.
"

"Silent enim leges inter arma" - Cicero

6 posted on 02/24/2010 3:21:04 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy
Obama's United States Solicitor General Elena Kagan argued that the law made it okay to be a member of a designated terror group!

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) makes it a federal felony for any American to provide:

to any group that the U.S. government designates as a terrorist organization.
7 posted on 02/24/2010 4:09:58 AM PST by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson