Until something like that happens, we shouldn't expect our pundits to promote an issue that is presently radioactive.
I have a feeling it will be more important in the 2012 election and i have a feeling Zero may not run again.
But I don’t know I swing both ways.
I agree wholeheartedly. I don't expect him to promote the Birther issue, at least until some Court agrees to hear it. I never said he should promote this.
Neither, however, do I want some puffed-up ex-junkie using his national TV audience to paint me as a "crazy, America Hating moron" for questioning O'Blamebush's Natural Born status.
It isn't right, and you trying to change the subject doesn't make it right.
;-/
The idiots like Coulter (I liked her a lot - PAST tense), O’Reilly the Leprechaun sex pervert, Beck (unstable idiot), Boortz (tedious bore), Medved, Hewitt (dull), Ingraham ( snarky tedium) and a few others could have just said no comment etc. Instead - they used the Alinsky-ite approach to make fun of Americans demanding proof. They can go to h*ll and they can F themselves.
If they want to jump on the consevative bandwagon to cash in like the effing pretenders they are - maybe these AH’s should emulate someone like Rush.
Tonight, I listened to Michael Savage who was praising Michelle Bachmann to the heavens saying she was a real conservative. He loved her CPAC speech and had her on. She is great.
He also met with another great conservative in Cong. John Culverson (or is it Culbertson) from Texas. Savage can be a prickly hothead but he did not smear and insult “birthers.”