This is a sad, sad day.
Link
To: LdSentinal
come on, that aussie music is like reggae -- it all sounds alike.
Colin is actually quite a guitar player, incidentally.
2 posted on
02/04/2010 2:32:47 PM PST by
the invisib1e hand
(governance is not sovereignty [paraphrasing Bishop Fulton Sheen].)
To: LdSentinal
Is there no statute of limitations on such a claim? Goddness, it been 25 years!
3 posted on
02/04/2010 2:34:06 PM PST by
dinoparty
To: LdSentinal
I know both songs and frankly, I don’t see very much similarity. This is in no way a slam-dunk, as was the “He’s So Fine/My Sweet Lord” plagiarism.
4 posted on
02/04/2010 2:34:08 PM PST by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
To: LdSentinal
I've played that a few times.
What's fun is when you're playing tenor saxophone in rock situation, you're playing in F# and B all night...
7 posted on
02/04/2010 2:37:13 PM PST by
real saxophonist
(The fact that you play tuba doesn't make you any less lethal. -USMC bandsman in Iraq)
To: LdSentinal
A few years ago, Colin Hay put out an album called Man at Work. In addition to new songs, he included a few solo acoustic reworking of a some Men At Work hits - Down Under, Overkill, Who Can it Be Now.
It's really an excellent album all around.
8 posted on
02/04/2010 2:37:42 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: LdSentinal
Laugh, Kookaburra! Laugh, Kookaburra!
Gay your life must be
To: LdSentinal
Ridiculous...
I have heard a lot worse. And why didn’t Marion Sinclair before she died in 1988? Why didn’t Larrikin Music sue before 2010?
12 posted on
02/04/2010 2:47:41 PM PST by
pepperhead
(Kennedys float, Mary Jos don't)
To: LdSentinal
Okay, I know both songs (“Kookaburra” made it up here to the States, too) and now that I think about it I get the resemblance, but I had no idea “Kookaburra” was under copyright. More to the point...nobody with a financial interest noticed the resemblance almost thirty years ago, back when “Down Under” was hitting Number One in Australia, the UK and the US? Really?
16 posted on
02/04/2010 2:55:48 PM PST by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: LdSentinal
That judge has a head full of zombie.
19 posted on
02/04/2010 3:20:27 PM PST by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: LdSentinal
I learned to sing that song in elementary school and probably sang it hundreds of times at school and at camp. I love the Men at Work song and never, ever, heard a likeness, although the Kookaburra song is engraved on my brain cells. I think the court is tone-deaf.
21 posted on
02/04/2010 3:29:54 PM PST by
La Lydia
To: LdSentinal
Bad ruling. That song is not similar. Whoever thinks it does is not thinking about music but only about money.
22 posted on
02/04/2010 3:32:12 PM PST by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality.)
To: LdSentinal
“I have come to the view that the flute riff in Down Under
infringes on the copyright of Kookaburra”
A freaking riff!? If that were actionable then a lot of people would owe Chuck Berry big money. For that matter alot of producers of cheesy flicks would ALSO owe this publisher for that crappy flute riff.
25 posted on
02/04/2010 3:49:07 PM PST by
TalBlack
To: LdSentinal
To: LdSentinal
They don't sound alike to me....of course it's only two bars of the song. Unreal.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson