Look at the division and hate he brings on everywhere, even here
by his Legion of RomneyBOTs, like yourself.
Posted on 01/19/2010 7:02:37 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
What a great day in America.
Not only has the Republican party just scored a breathtakingly important victory - while inspiring patriotic Americans everywhere.
Another important thing happened today:
It's even more fascinating to see what preposterous nonsense some Romney haters will make up to avoid admitting that every conservative doesn't hate Mitt Romney. Is Romney still leading in the polls of possible 2012 candidates?
And, I've expanded my watch list for 2012 candidates I might support to Palin, Romney and now Thune. Need to learn more about Thune.
Lol, who knows who's causing division on the subject of Romney as most people at FR avoid the subject, knowing what sort of one-sided, tag team action it brings to any thread where his name is mentioned.
But I think even you have to admit that Mitt enjoyed a definite uptick in status last night due to his early support of Brown, and also the role his campaign workers played in the Brown victory.
The conservative movement that has all this great energy currently.
You could not conceal your militant Romneyism for long could you? You are back to your main agenda here, pushing Romney.
It is imperative that America stop the lying slime bag.
That is a constant of yours, mentioning the "beards" as you push Mitt Romney.
Lol, you are ridiculous. Just because you can't contain your hatred of Romney even enough to realize that there are people who will consider him in 2012, along with Palin and Thune, and maybe others, doesn't mean many others won't.
It's you that's out on the fringes in evaluating the potential candidates, not me.
Lol, you make yourself look more foolish with each post, trying to fit everyone into your little hate Romney world.
This is freerepublic, the premier conservative, web site.
As the owner says, FR may not be for everyone, and he directed that at Romneybots.
I think he and the rest of FR does not want to go through the nasty hell that you Romneybots caused for so long.
While toasting Mitt the Twit in one slot we need to drop Newt into the other.
I'm with good "fringe" company.
Then that should be posted plainly on page 1 of Free Republic, rather than used as a cheap threat by self-appointed hall monitors like you. Direct your complaint to the owners.
The only nasty hell I've noticed around here is caused by people who go nuts at any mention of Romney's name. This all started with the mere statement of fact that Romney was complimented last night, and probably gained some stature.
When simple facts bother you that much, maybe you need to engage in a little self-examination.
LOL, I guess you did not notice when the chief "hall monitor" did just that, by posting Romney video at the top of every thread for weeks, trying to give people like you the message.
If there is anyone here who doesn't understand why we cannot support a slick socialist politician like Mitt Romney, God help you, but you're on the wrong website. We went through this with the abortionist, gay rights activist, illegal alien supporting, gun grabbing Rudy Giuliani until someone created another website call WAnkers for Rudy and they all flew the coop. Hopefully, before too much FReeper blood is shed, someone will create a WAnkers for Romney site and we can be left to fight the good fight as we see fit!
FR is not for everyone!
1 posted on Sunday, May 03, 2009 12:32:08 PM by Jim Robinson
Yep, I’ve noticed that before. And you need to take what I say as fact, and stop twisting everything to suit your narrow little view. You are an awful pop psychologist.
Without Romney, Brown likely loses. I am not a Romney supporter, but I’m willing to give the man his due.
No one can take you at face value, your agenda is to always advance Mitt Romney.
You play games, such as always offering up beards as covers, but you are always concentrating on advancing the center of your FR universe, Mitt Romney.
You even deny it, on thread after thread after thread, for year after year, as you keep doing the same thing, pushing Mitt Romney.
People have to look at what you do and what you post (endlessly), not what you claim.
No one can take anything you say at face value because you are blinded by your obsession with Mitt Romney. He's just one of several possible candidates, and there will probably be candidates we don't even know about yet.
But I know it's beyond pointless to try and reason with you.
You said several posts back that you were finished with this.
I’m not blinded by anything, I am a conservative that knows the Mitt Romney record and biography in depth, I even remember his father very well. You have always refused to accept who Romney is and you have always ignored or tried to sweep away the Mitt Romney that existed before he started the 2008 primary.
Which post was that where I said that I was “finished with this”?
You're absolutely blinded by your obsession with Romney, and the fact that every conservative doesn't agree with you. There were polls in Florida and other states where voters who considered themselves to be conservatives gave Romney the second largest conservative vote. Many conservatives voted for Romney in 2008, and consider him to be conservative, whether you like it or not.
And, you have a terrible habit of trying to twist others' words to suit your own agenda. That's a big part of your problem. It's just comical how you try to twist what I say and practice your pop psychology. My "beards". Lol, your refusal to accept that there are opinions other than your own.
As I'm only scanning your repetitive rants, I read an "I'm out" from you as meaning you were out of the conversation. But, now, I'm out of this conversation because all it does is plow old ground that's been plowed before.
LOL, on which post did I say “I’m Out” ?
As usual you say that Romney is just one of many viable candidates and then you zero in on one man, the same man that you have pushed here for years, the failed Governor Mitt Romney, the man that in his many years of politics has only succeeded in winning that one election.
Mitt could not win reelection, and he left office with 34% approval and 65% disapproval, being the fourth Republican Governor in a row there, his disastrous reign led to the seat becoming Democrat.
To Romney the single victory, any victory was all he wanted as an excuse to run for President, although no one knows why, he doesn’t seem to have any particular views about anything, or any love for America or it’s people.
When trying to understand the inner man, all we can do is look at his first 60 years, what we see there is a consistent (and for Mitt) intense dislike for anything connected to conservatism or patriotism.
But it's pretty childish to continually try to bully someone by mentioning the site owner to bolster your own bluster. I want another clarification:
Have you been appointed by the site owner to enforce some rules about what is or is not permitted on this site?
You act like posters over at Little Green Footballs who pop up like jacks-in-the-box and try to bully people who post things they might disagree with, and where there is a long list of cult-like prohibitions on what can and cannot be said, and dropping the site owner's name to bolster their unofficial, or self-appointed role is commonplace.
So, since I thought I'd clarified things with the Admin. Moderator months ago, and you are still in your hall monitor act, was the clarification I received incorrect?
If the clarification I received for the Admin. Moderator was not incorrect, then why not end your Little Green Football poster imitation and just make your points without threatening people with the site owner's wrath?
What today really illustrates is how rabid and irrational some of you are as I only made a slight mention of Romney in a totally factual context. And there has been very little discussion of Romney for weeks until last night.
So, get with the site owner or the moderator and re-clarify the rules if I am violating them, or maybe stop being such a childish name-dropper.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.