But it's pretty childish to continually try to bully someone by mentioning the site owner to bolster your own bluster. I want another clarification:
Have you been appointed by the site owner to enforce some rules about what is or is not permitted on this site?
You act like posters over at Little Green Footballs who pop up like jacks-in-the-box and try to bully people who post things they might disagree with, and where there is a long list of cult-like prohibitions on what can and cannot be said, and dropping the site owner's name to bolster their unofficial, or self-appointed role is commonplace.
So, since I thought I'd clarified things with the Admin. Moderator months ago, and you are still in your hall monitor act, was the clarification I received incorrect?
If the clarification I received for the Admin. Moderator was not incorrect, then why not end your Little Green Football poster imitation and just make your points without threatening people with the site owner's wrath?
What today really illustrates is how rabid and irrational some of you are as I only made a slight mention of Romney in a totally factual context. And there has been very little discussion of Romney for weeks until last night.
So, get with the site owner or the moderator and re-clarify the rules if I am violating them, or maybe stop being such a childish name-dropper.
You seem upset that Romneybots are being sent a message on this conservative site.
As long as you keep persisting in pushing that scum bag, compulsive liar, then you will continue to be answered by the conservatives here.
When the owner continually posts entire threads emphasising freerepublics animosity to the liberal politics of Mitt Romney, and in fact the sleazy man himself, then you will see those threads referenced as you continue your cult like devotion to Romney.
“Actually, now is when we start shaping our options for the upcoming presidential election.
Priority number one is to eliminate Mitt Romney.”