Instead I believe they will either confirm or deny the authenticity of the stamp.
The point is that Kenya, under the notorious Prime Minister Odinga, is so corrupt and tribally related to Obama that no one in their right mind would believe a denial based on their say-so.
To satisfy partisans from both sides, more that just the FRE requirement of Kenyan government authentication or denial would be needed. I would expect that a forensic analysis in Kenya of the original CPGH BC in the hospital files would be needed.
This would include signature samples from the original doctor and witness as well as interviews with Maganga and validation of his stamp and a hospital seal impression.
There should also be comparisons made with other BC’s from August 1961, and open access to interviews with potential 1961 witnesses would close finally close the issue. It is pointless and grossly unfair to criticize Lucas Smith for "failing" to provide this extremely expensive forensic analysis that would require enormous political influence to initiate.
Per Smith's affidavit in CA he said he requested Taitz to use her money, influence and legal means to initiate exactly this kind of authentication to the extent possible, but she told Smith that this was unnecessary, apparently because she didn't understand the FRE.
You, Mik Taerg, may not be dissuaded from your personal vendetta against Lucas Smith by fairness and logic, but I suspect that most FReepers will.
The point is that Kenya, under the notorious Prime Minister Odinga, is so corrupt and tribally related to Obama that no one in their right mind would believe a denial based on their say-so.
To satisfy partisans from both sides, more that just the FRE requirement of Kenyan government authentication or denial would be needed. I would expect that a forensic analysis in Kenya of the original CPGH BC in the hospital files would be needed.
This would include signature samples from the original doctor and witness as well as interviews with Maganga and validation of his stamp and a hospital seal impression.
There should also be comparisons made with other BC’s from August 1961, and open access to interviews with potential 1961 witnesses would close finally close the issue. It is pointless and grossly unfair to criticize Lucas Smith for "failing" to provide this extremely expensive forensic analysis that would require enormous political influence to initiate.
Per Smith's affidavit in CA he said he requested Taitz to use her money, influence and legal means to initiate exactly this kind of authentication to the extent possible, but she told Smith that this was unnecessary, apparently because she didn't understand the FRE.
You, Mik Taerg, may not be dissuaded from your personal vendetta against Lucas Smith by fairness and logic, but I suspect that most FReepers will.