“Beginning at your comment #63 you appear to have come to FR primarily to debunk FReeper Lucas Smith’s CPGH BC and to defend Obama and Obama’s eligibility.”...
Ha ha ha ha Didn’t I tell you that I don’t harbor any personal vendetta against Lucas? I simply want him to prove his kenyan bc. It appears to me that when you can’t rebut an assertion that you will now start an animosity between us?...I’d really prefer for Lucas Smith to answer all of my questions. And please don’t post any insults as I will not do that to you or anyone!
I have a neurological disability that forces me off-line for hours at a time throughout the day. In your introductory comment #63 you admit to following Mik Taerg’s inconclusive accusations against Smith on Smith's Youtube site and them you come to FR to pile on in support of Mik Taerg’s speculations after Smith banned Mik Taerg.
Did I get that right? And this is not in furtherance of the same vendetta as pursued by Mik Taerg, i.e. declaring your speculations about Smith to be fact and then making accusations against Smith? You were not even aware of Obama's intensive involvement in the campaign of his fellow Luo tribesman Odinga in 2006 and the disaster that resulted, so your research into the affairs of Kenya and Obama is at a very early stage, too early to suggest that Lucas Smith should be doubted because he won't disclose how he obtained the BC or to suggest that any statement by Kenyan authorities could be believed. I have suggested that when the MSM and big money Democrat protection of Obama comes down in the US and in Kenya, it might be possible for investigative journalists and forensic scientists to do the vetting job that should have been done before the 2008 election. The fact that that vetting didn't occur is not the fault of Lucas Smith.