Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stuartcr
Wouldn’t it be determined by the resistance of saliva? 5a=5v/1ohm

Yes, you are correct - Ohm's Law applies.

However, the USB has LIMITED power output to no more than 0.5 Amps; thus the absolute maximum power the infant could be exposed to is no more than 2.625 Watts (5.25 Volts x 0.5 Amps).

2.625 Watts will NOT do this kind of damage.

16 posted on 01/11/2010 6:57:41 AM PST by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Hodar

Like you said, must be a malfunction.


17 posted on 01/11/2010 7:03:24 AM PST by stuartcr (If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Hodar
2.625 Watts will NOT do this kind of damage.

I'm with you on this. They are covering up something else. This is a current limiting device unlike say a 9Volt battery. We have all done the tongue test on a battery without this extensive damage.

There are aproximately 9 BTUs max of heat from a standard USB device. The infant's injuries are not consistent with this.

At a minimum it sounds like a wall outlet power chord, but the parents are planning on cashing in by misdirection.
28 posted on 01/11/2010 9:21:08 AM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson