Skip to comments.
OMG! IBM Patented LOL! ROTFLMAO!
techdirt ^
Posted on 12/31/2009 7:48:14 AM PST by Gomez
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
1
posted on
12/31/2009 7:48:14 AM PST
by
Gomez
To: Gomez
TCSMB.
They can suck my bells.
2
posted on
12/31/2009 7:49:29 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(DEFINITION: rac-ist (rA'sis't) 1. Anyone who disagrees with a liberal about any topic.)
To: Gomez
3
posted on
12/31/2009 7:50:00 AM PST
by
OB1kNOb
(Liberals want conservatives to give Obama time. I agree. I think life without parole is sufficient)
To: SunkenCiv; muawiyah; blam; FromLori; sonofstrangelove; SJackson; onyx
To: Gomez
So now they have to enforce their patent. Once they fail to enforce it then don’t they essentially lose it?
5
posted on
12/31/2009 7:51:14 AM PST
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: theKid51; ourusa
6
posted on
12/31/2009 7:51:29 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(Free the Navy Seals)
To: Gomez
7
posted on
12/31/2009 7:52:46 AM PST
by
Huck
(The Constitution is an outrageous insult to the men who fought the Revolution." -Patrick Henry)
To: Lazamataz
IBM can KMA (kiss my aspirin).
8
posted on
12/31/2009 7:52:47 AM PST
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: driftdiver
So now they have to enforce their patent. Once they fail to enforce it then dont they essentially lose it?That's right - after six months, we can tell them to ESAD.
9
posted on
12/31/2009 7:54:11 AM PST
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Gomez
To: Gomez
I wonder if anyone has a trademark on TM.
11
posted on
12/31/2009 7:54:57 AM PST
by
Huck
(The Constitution is an outrageous insult to the men who fought the Revolution." -Patrick Henry)
To: Gomez
Must have a really good patent reward system for employees at IBM Rochester.
12
posted on
12/31/2009 7:55:16 AM PST
by
bigbob
To: Gomez
The scope of the patent is defined by its claims. Here is the main claim. Every element must be infringed as defined - otherwise there is no infringement. There is nothing strange about this kind of patents, adding minor improvements to a known concept.
“1. A computer-implemented method of automatically determining the meaning of a shorthand notation in an electronic communication, the method comprising:
receiving, on a recipient messaging device, a text communication sent from a sender messaging device, wherein the text communication comprises at least one shorthand term; automatically analyzing, on the recipient messaging device, the context of the text communication to automatically select one or more shorthand target terms from the text communication;
searching one or more databases from a plurality of databases to obtain one or more longhand terms for the one or more shorthand target terms, wherein the one or more longhand terms are defined with respect to the one or more shorthand target terms and wherein the one or more databases are selected from the group consisting of a personal database, a general purpose database, and a specialty database;
automatically evaluating the one or more longhand terms to determine whether the one or more shorthand target terms is ambiguous in the context of the communication, wherein the evaluating comprises determining a number of matching longhand terms to identify one or more unambiguous alternative longhand terms; and automatically displaying, on the recipient messaging device, one or more of the unambiguous longhand terms proximate to, or within, the original text communication, wherein the displaying further comprises ranking the unambiguous longhand terms obtained from the one or more databases according to at least one of a sender identity and a recipient identity”
13
posted on
12/31/2009 7:55:44 AM PST
by
heiss
(True Conservatives came from Senate Centrist Coalition!)
To: Gomez
This is Hugh and Series. FR
14
posted on
12/31/2009 7:55:54 AM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(During this joyous Christmas season, I'd like you to know....A reindeer bit my sister once.)
To: Lazamataz
They can suck my bells. Bunch cork suckers. Bastages!
15
posted on
12/31/2009 7:56:24 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: hennie pennie
16
posted on
12/31/2009 7:56:37 AM PST
by
onyx
To: Gomez
IBM? Is that Involuntary Bowel Movement?
17
posted on
12/31/2009 7:56:56 AM PST
by
Hoodat
(For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
To: Puppage
18
posted on
12/31/2009 7:57:08 AM PST
by
RexBeach
("Those are my principles...if you don't like them, I have others." Groucho Marx)
To: andy58-in-nh
19
posted on
12/31/2009 7:57:13 AM PST
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Huck
I wonder if anyone has a trademark on TM.That would be the Transcendental Meditation folks...
20
posted on
12/31/2009 7:58:16 AM PST
by
null and void
(We are now in day 343 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson