To: Maelstorm
I despise these two more than anything; however, it is somewhat redeeming when they find their philanthropic side. Granted $100,000 donation would be akin to a $10 donation from the rest of us working stiffs, yet I won’t scoff at it.
4 posted on
12/28/2009 5:37:39 PM PST by
Mengerian
To: Mengerian
She’s given millions to charities in the past.
6 posted on
12/28/2009 5:38:56 PM PST by
BlessedBeGod
(New Wizard of Oz: Pelosi as the Wicked Witch of the West & Michelle as the Wicked Witch of the East.)
To: Mengerian
“Granted $100,000 donation would be akin to a $10 donation from the rest of us working stiffs”
Sure - if we got half a million dollars-worth of great publicity for our $10, it would be the same.
8 posted on
12/28/2009 5:41:00 PM PST by
chuck_the_tv_out
( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
To: Mengerian
Granted $100,000 donation would be akin to a $10 donation from the rest of us working stiffs, yet I wont scoff at it. Actually the two of them have cut back their workload tremendously to raise their kids. A producer told Variety that Pitt turned down a $5 million offer to M/C an event in Dubai (like 10 min on stage), so he could go trick or treating with his kids. Jolie hasn't done a major acting role in 2 years. Jim Carrey alone is probably worth twice the two of them combined.
To: Mengerian
Yes. And they have done their part to undermine the traditional family, and this in the long run causes more harm than whatever they donate. I would be more impressed with their generosity if the contributions were done anonymously.
btw, Taylor Swift has donated in the last half year some $350,000 that I know of.
To: Mengerian
They have given millions to charity.
20 posted on
12/28/2009 5:59:24 PM PST by
svcw
(The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves. GW)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson