Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyDancer

I dont think she will get anything he made before their marriage. I believe it would be half of what he made during the marriage.

Why shouldnt she get that? A marriage is a partnership.


28 posted on 12/21/2009 2:03:16 PM PST by New Yawk Minute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: New Yawk Minute

I think that was what I was saying ... she’s entitled(?) to what he made after they got married but what he had before I don’t think so ....


45 posted on 12/21/2009 2:09:31 PM PST by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: New Yawk Minute

Not necessarily. In California it is a not fault community property state. Unless specifically excluded everything becomes part of the marital assets. Plus the fact those funds will be counted as assets when child support is figured out. Since the marriage was only a five yea marriage it will be deemed short term and some value will be placed for alimony but it will be short lived. Child support will continue at least until the kids are 18 ——older depending on the attorneys. That is at a minimum. What they negotiate will be interesting


59 posted on 12/21/2009 2:26:19 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson