You've contributed nothing to the discussion. You've only come back with ad hominum.
I conclude you have nothing to contribute but just like to see your words in print.
Bye.
You are the one who said my conclusion about you was inaccurate. You neither defended your position nor added to the discussion.
My analogy was to assist you to understand my post. Clearly it was accurate and touched a nerve.
As far as the discussion goes, it has been pointed to you that a person can contract away their rights (an earlier contention I made which you did not address, probably because you didn’t understand it).
It is you that is dragging this thread down in your abject ignorance about the law and the USC.