I think the big problem here is that Psystar’s lawyers SUCKED!
This was a bad company, with bad representation, to be defending such an important test case.
That certainly appears to be the case.
This was a bad company, with bad representation, to be defending such an important test case.
Well now..., the "big money" that was behind Psycho-star, just shoulda given them more money for attorneys then....
Of course, when the big money saw what was about to happen, and to avoid them being exposed -- they cut and ran, leaving Psycho-star hanging out there by itself... ooops... (for Psycho-star... LOL...).
That's strange.... the first team were the one's everyone was touting as the only one's that could possibly bring Apple down as they had gotten some kind of win once before. Then Psystar failed to pay them... and declared bankruptcy owing them $85,000...
The next guys were "cowboys" from Texas... who "thought differently" and opened a new Florida offensive case (in both meanings of the word) with much the same arguments the first guys used for defense in California that had ALREADY been tossed out of court: "Apple was an illegal monopoly in the OS X computer Market... only this time it's "Apple is an illegal monopoly in the over $1000 computer Market." Boy, do they think different...
The real "different thinking" was that they were willing to work on a contingency fee basis.
But, all in all... you are probably right.