Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

F-22 and the Survival of American Air Power

F-22 Termination: America’s Self-Induced Strategic Death Spiral

F-22A Raptor: More Bang for the Buck than F-35 JSF….with Far Less Risk

F-22: 187 Raptors is NOT Enough!

Top reasons why the F-22 Raptor is the only Western 5th Generation fighter most capable of maintaining air dominance for the USAF.


1 posted on 12/06/2009 2:26:24 PM PST by myknowledge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: myknowledge

Wicked looking craft...


2 posted on 12/06/2009 2:29:18 PM PST by jessduntno (Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: myknowledge

President Palin will reestablish the program as Reagan did the B-1.


3 posted on 12/06/2009 2:31:48 PM PST by Hazwaste (Some people are like slinkies. Only good for pushing down stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: myknowledge
Here's a real photo ...

Photobucket

4 posted on 12/06/2009 2:31:52 PM PST by OwenKellogg (GOE 1, July 4, Sep 12, and Nov 7 DC rallies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: myknowledge
F-22 vertical climb
5 posted on 12/06/2009 2:47:55 PM PST by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: myknowledge
If we can't have all the F-22's we need, at least make more F-15's and F-16's, upgrade their avionics from the 1980's a bit. The F-35 looks like a piece of junk to me, I'd take an F-4, my favorite next to the Avro Arrow, first. Still, between the two, I'd take more F-22's over the F-35.

Still overall, if you want to go on a shoestring, bring back the F-4 with upgraded avionics. B-)
7 posted on 12/06/2009 2:56:42 PM PST by Nowhere Man (The night they drove old America down (11-07-2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: myknowledge

We make kick-ass aircraft!

The left doesn’t like American superiority which is why they hate our technology.


10 posted on 12/06/2009 3:03:06 PM PST by rbosque (11 year Freeper! Can't get rid of me Jim! Well, you can but you've put up with me so far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: myknowledge

Of course it’s the best... that’s why 0bambi’s white house killed it


15 posted on 12/06/2009 4:25:47 PM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A.A. Cunningham
14 posts and no F/A-18 HUD shot yet. You're slipping.

Some of the F-15C fleet is getting upgraded with AESA radar and AIM-9X missiles. They are informally referred to as "Golden Eagles" and will be around for a very long time.

16 posted on 12/06/2009 4:26:36 PM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: myknowledge
Exclusive: White House aides insisted F-22 be removed from Obama speech venue

When President Obama spoke to troops at Alaska's Elmendorf Air Force Base last month, the unit there parked a shiny new F-22 fighter plane in the hangar. But according to multiple sources, White House aides demanded the plane be changed to an older F-15 fighter because they didn't want Obama speaking in front of the F-22, a controversial program he fought hard to end.

"White House aides actually made them remove the F-22-said they would not allow POTUS to be pictured with the F-22 in any way, shape, or form," one source close to the unit relayed.

Stephen Lee, a public affairs officer at Elmendorf, confirmed to The Cable that the F-22 was parked in the hangar and then was replaced by an F-15 at the White House's behest.

The airmen there took offense to the Obama aides' demand, sources told The Cable, seeing it as a slight to the folks who are operating the F-22 proudly every day. They also expressed bewilderment that the White House staff would even care so much as to make an issue out of the fact that the F-22 was placed in the hangar with the president.

A White House official, commenting on background basis, told The Cable that yes, there were discussions about which plane or planes would be in the hangar, but that they were not meant as an insult to the pilots and other personnel who work on the F-22. The official couldn't elaborate on why the White House aides felt it necessary to get involved in the matter in the first place.

The official pointed to Obama's speech to the troops that day, where he praised both the 90th Fighter Squadron, known as the "Dicemen," and the 525th Fighter Squadron, the "Bulldogs," both of which operate the F-22.

Even so, the Air Force personnel thought it odd the White House wanted to display the older plane rather than the more advanced plane that, in the eyes of its supporters, represents the latest and greatest in American aviation.

The Obama administration fought hard and successfully to cut off production of the F-22 at 187 planes, a number Defense Secretary Robert Gates endorsed but that was hundreds less than originally planned and about half of the 381 planes Air Force leadership lobbied hard for in the years preceding Obama's inauguration.

"It's one thing to be against further production; quite another to slight the folks who are flying them in the operational world," one source said, adding that "the F-15 pictured was put into service roughly around the same period when Obama graduated from college. It's vintage."

Josh Rogin

17 posted on 12/06/2009 4:35:01 PM PST by mcmuffin (Will American patriots and freedom prevail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: myknowledge
Its key feature is its stealth quality, which allows it to run undetected by enemy radar.

Unadulterated bull s***. The "author" of this piece of crap article ought to take a look at some emissions and susceptibility data. Once he does that then he can travel to Cherry Point and Whidbey Island and take a look at the reams of ATOs requiring SEAD support for these platforms that "run undetected by enemy radar."

John Tsucalas is an idiot.

20 posted on 12/06/2009 5:53:48 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: myknowledge

http://www.cdi.org/program/document.cfm?DocumentID=3557&StartRow=1&ListRows=10&appendURL=&Orderby

Another question: Why buy more F-22s when the AF can move into the future of Unmanned Aircrafts?


25 posted on 01/12/2010 8:15:31 PM PST by AccountabilityGov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson