Skip to comments.
Tiger Woods Didn't Pay Rachel a Penny
TMZ ^
| 12/03/09
| Staff
Posted on 12/03/2009 9:47:58 PM PST by BunnySlippers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: BunnySlippers
She’s writing a book and why give out the dirt for free; unless Tiger is going to pay her to not publish one.
To: SeaHawkFan
She better hire a bodyguard before she gets Donald Young’d by a vengeful black ex-lover.
3
posted on
12/03/2009 9:53:13 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Only payoff for being a Democrat? They get the illusion that they are intellectually superior to you)
To: BunnySlippers
Every time I see your name, I think of this:
4
posted on
12/03/2009 9:55:34 PM PST
by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
To: BunnySlippers
I read a story today that casually mentioned that his Mother was in the house and responded to the crash scene. I had brought up the question of who else was there earlier or had they just came home from a dinner elsewhere as I doubt they spent turkey dinner alone...
5
posted on
12/03/2009 10:02:25 PM PST
by
tubebender
(Some minds are like concrete Thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
To: BunnySlippers
"Tiger Woods Didn't Pay Rachel a Penny."Is there some reason you and I should care? I can say I don't.
6
posted on
12/03/2009 10:05:27 PM PST
by
blackbart.223
(I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
To: BunnySlippers
Eww, that has to be the worst Tiger photo ever.
7
posted on
12/03/2009 10:05:30 PM PST
by
GnuHere
To: BunnySlippers
Headline parsing?
-or-
How much is a baby Tiger worth?
8
posted on
12/03/2009 10:08:14 PM PST
by
PeaceBeWithYou
(De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
To: BunnySlippers
as far as Tiger Woods is concerned this past week I feel as though I dropped blotter acid and am having a really bad trip that just keeps getting worse.
9
posted on
12/03/2009 10:12:52 PM PST
by
GOP Poet
(Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
To: BunnySlippers
I say it’s a business decision.
Rachel has been playing concubine and arm candy to a succession of Alpha males for quite a few years. If she spills the beans on Tiger she will have damaged her brand and can forget about snagging any more clients/boyfriends to lavish her with expensive gifts, etc. She has to take the long view here and show that she can keep secrets.
10
posted on
12/03/2009 10:13:59 PM PST
by
sinanju
To: BunnySlippers
I am so tired of all the coverage about Tiger. Who really gives a $hit, anyway. Let him either work it out with his wife and family or get a big and expensive “D” and be done with it. That’s just my opinion.
11
posted on
12/03/2009 10:32:47 PM PST
by
jws3sticks
(Sarah Palin forever!)
To: BunnySlippers
News travels fast. The Chinese are already making a movie about Tiger Woods’ crash. They are calling it, “Scratching Swede, Lying Tiger.
12
posted on
12/03/2009 10:33:34 PM PST
by
razorback-bert
(We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.)
To: GOP Poet
To: GOP Poet
"As far as Tiger Woods is concerned.Not a serious issue. Stay away from the drugs.
14
posted on
12/03/2009 10:34:49 PM PST
by
blackbart.223
(I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
To: BunnySlippers
One very connected source said, "This was absolutely not about money." And the Moon is made of green cheese.
15
posted on
12/03/2009 10:36:44 PM PST
by
FlyVet
To: sinanju
Ya know what gets me..that first she denied it..then was going to have a news conference..and then..decides not to..but, just cant help saying why. Was it necessary to say that she knows about his other women, his marriage, which should be private, etc?
If this guys wife or anybodys wife, has to consider if she will stay or go..it sure doesnt help when they have to hear crap like this. Doesnt anyone see the wife as a human being? These bimbos sure want to be front and center, any way they can, at anyones expense. Maybe somebody should “flatten” them.
As far as tiger and the wife (if she intends to stay) they should disappear for a year..they have plenty of money to do that. This will all die down and they will then have someone elses private business to air.
To: jws3sticks
"Who really gives a $hit, anyway."I don't. There at least two of us.
17
posted on
12/03/2009 10:48:55 PM PST
by
blackbart.223
(I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
To: New Yawk Minute
Doesnt anyone see the wife as a human being?Apparently Tiger was blinded by lust.
18
posted on
12/03/2009 10:50:21 PM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: BunnySlippers
Tiger is a celebrity, and he uses his name and reputation to make billions of dollars. What he does off of the golf course matters. He is very much concerned about his “brand,” for he knows that it is worth an astronomical amount of income. He forfeited his right to privacy the first time he plastered his face all over a Wheaties box. Tiger means nothing to me, but he does impact our culture. This is a celebrity driven society. That is the reality. I wish it were not, but it is. Obama is a prime example of what happens to a nation which is built upon a cult of personality. People are using the “its no one’s business” argument as a way of deflecting moral judgments against Tiger. It gives Tiger an ethical pass. Just as there are categories of moral and cultural relativism, maybe we should add a third category called celebrity relativism. Objective moral standards do not apply to celebrities. By ignoring Tiger's actions, as a cultural icon, is destructive to society. No society can exist for long based upon “celebrity relativism.”
To: BunnySlippers
The big hammer still needs to drop on Tiger and it has nothing to do with women.
Think Andre Agassi.
20
posted on
12/04/2009 12:32:21 AM PST
by
Cyman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson