Skip to comments.
What's The Difference Between "Birther" And "Truther"?
November 28, 2009
| Man50D
Posted on 11/29/2009 11:45:33 AM PST by Man50D
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: Just mythoughts
Now clearly Hillary stayed well outside of the perimeter of the 'birther' movement, but she has NEVER denounced it either.Remember her supporters from PUMA.com gals mad like hell about Barry!??!
61
posted on
11/29/2009 1:08:46 PM PST
by
danamco
To: 240B
62
posted on
11/29/2009 1:12:16 PM PST
by
danamco
Comment #63 Removed by Moderator
To: JoSixChip
Have the “thruthers” ever advanced to the courts???
64
posted on
11/29/2009 1:14:17 PM PST
by
danamco
To: Man50D
Hey Man, in replying to #40 you said, "That is the article I posted."
Go to the link in #40. Right next to the last sentence of the article there, on the right hand side, you'll see the picture below...that links directly to 911 truther garbage.

We are not allowed here to post links to pages that link themselves directly to 911 truther crap.
65
posted on
11/29/2009 1:14:21 PM PST
by
deks
To: Man50D
The admins are apparently volunteers, some with a God complex. I personally think ‘truthers’ are nuts, but why not allow discussion and debate?
66
posted on
11/29/2009 1:16:41 PM PST
by
EDINVA
To: cripplecreek
What happened in Alabama when a willing Colonel called out the reserves???
67
posted on
11/29/2009 1:16:58 PM PST
by
danamco
To: Man50D
Confucious say:
He who jack with Admin Moderator usually get jacked himself.
To: Jim Robinson; LucyT
Now, Jim, is that a conspiracy thought, LOL???
69
posted on
11/29/2009 1:25:19 PM PST
by
danamco
To: danamco
Quoting Joe Friday, “Just the facts, Ma’am.”
70
posted on
11/29/2009 1:29:02 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Join the TEA Party Rebellion!! God save this great Republic!!)
To: Man50D
I know nothing about your disputed article, but you should know the following.
Birthers advance their point because Obama refuses to release the actual original birth certificate. That simple!
Truthers advance their point in spite of all evidence to the contrary - simply because they hate America and love its enemies!
And if you can't see that maybe you miss the point of FR: Free Republic is not about free to hate and libel the Republic!
71
posted on
11/29/2009 1:38:12 PM PST
by
drpix
To: dalereed
Obnoxious.
I’ve been a member since 1997. I’ve changed names since then. Not that it matters.
SnakeDoc
72
posted on
11/29/2009 1:39:07 PM PST
by
SnakeDoctor
("Talk low, talk slow, and don't say too much." -- John Wayne)
To: Man50D
There are legitimate questions about Obama’s birth. There is no reasonable doubt about how The World Trade Centers were brought down, or by whom. If you can’t tell the difference, go back to high school science class and learn about the scientific method.
73
posted on
11/29/2009 1:43:33 PM PST
by
3niner
(When Obama succeeds, America fails.)
To: dalereed
On a separate note — I don’t recall dictating anything. I simply defending the site-owner’s right to dictate.
SnakeDoc
74
posted on
11/29/2009 1:43:43 PM PST
by
SnakeDoctor
("Talk low, talk slow, and don't say too much." -- John Wayne)
To: danamco
What happened in Alabama when a willing Colonel called out the reserves???
Don't know. Apparently not much.
75
posted on
11/29/2009 1:51:47 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: Man50D; All
The left has truthers. The right has birthers. Two nuts from different sides of the same tree.
To: Man50D
You have posted a well-reasoned and logical argument for further discussion of your points.
For this, you will be scorned and punished...of course.
77
posted on
11/29/2009 4:03:05 PM PST
by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus)
To: drpix
Birthers advance their point because Obama refuses to release the actual original birth certificate. That simple!
There's far more it to than that fact. There is also several pieces hard documented evidence which confirms BO is ineligible. All of which I have agreed with for some time but that doesn't the fact we are still called "birthers" to discredit us as conspiracy nuts just as those who refer to those who believe BO is deploying troops in the U.S. to put down any potential civil war as "truthers".
Truthers advance their point in spite of all evidence to the contrary - simply because they hate America and love its enemies!
You obviously didn't read the article before it was pulled. It was in reference to those who believe BO is using the military to suppress any dissension against his unconstitutional, socialist policies. It maybe just a conspiracy but at least back up such a claim with sources people can refer to for themselves instead of immediately denouncing the issue.
And if you can't see that maybe you miss the point of FR: Free Republic is not about free to hate and libel the Republic!
You haven't begun to address the point I was making in previous related threads given you didn't read the article that was pulled. Thank you for illustrating the haste in which some people at this website use to jump to conclusions.
78
posted on
11/29/2009 4:21:41 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: 3niner
There are legitimate questions about Obamas birth.
There are more than legitimate questions. There is physical documentation of which I agree.
There is no reasonable doubt about how The World Trade Centers were brought down, or by whom.
Obviously you didn't read the thread that was pulled or the first sentence of this thread. The original article I posted had nothing to do with The WTC. The article discussed BO deploying U.S. troops in the U.S. to stifle any uprising as was indicated in the first line of this thread ("Obama Orders 1 Million US Troops To Prepare For Civil War").
If you cant tell the difference, go back to high school science class and learn about the scientific method.
You would be better off not making ignorant remarks if you won't bother to actually read or do any research and your only retort is an insult.
79
posted on
11/29/2009 4:30:58 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Man50D
I don't have to have read the article (you can't get posted for long enough for people to read) to
take issue with you equating "birthers" to "truthers." To get to the only point, "truthers" is a label applied to those who claim Al Qaeda did not bring down the WTC on 9/11 and that the US gov't, under Bush, did. As most of the posts to your thread demonstrate, "truthers" is not a term to apply to any other conspiracy you choice.
To make it short, do you think there is no difference between the "truthers" making their 9/11 WTC claim and the "birther" demanding real proof of BHO's birth? Or did you use a misleading thread title?
The title of your thread demands your answer!
80
posted on
11/29/2009 4:55:56 PM PST
by
drpix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson