Replies

Birthers advance their point because Obama refuses to release the actual original birth certificate. That simple!

There's far more it to than that fact. There is also several pieces hard documented evidence which confirms BO is ineligible. All of which I have agreed with for some time but that doesn't the fact we are still called "birthers" to discredit us as conspiracy nuts just as those who refer to those who believe BO is deploying troops in the U.S. to put down any potential civil war as "truthers".

Truthers advance their point in spite of all evidence to the contrary - simply because they hate America and love its enemies!

You obviously didn't read the article before it was pulled. It was in reference to those who believe BO is using the military to suppress any dissension against his unconstitutional, socialist policies. It maybe just a conspiracy but at least back up such a claim with sources people can refer to for themselves instead of immediately denouncing the issue.

And if you can't see that maybe you miss the point of FR: Free Republic is not about free to hate and libel the Republic!

You haven't begun to address the point I was making in previous related threads given you didn't read the article that was pulled. Thank you for illustrating the haste in which some people at this website use to jump to conclusions.

I don't have to have read the article (you can't get posted for long enough for people to read) to take issue with you equating "birthers" to "truthers."

To get to the only point, "truthers" is a label applied to those who claim Al Qaeda did not bring down the WTC on 9/11 and that the US gov't, under Bush, did. As most of the posts to your thread demonstrate, "truthers" is not a term to apply to any other conspiracy you choice.

To make it short, do you think there is no difference between the "truthers" making their 9/11 WTC claim and the "birther" demanding real proof of BHO's birth? Or did you use a misleading thread title?

The title of your thread demands your answer!