Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: The Louiswu
2 posted on
11/25/2009 5:31:58 AM PST by
Paladin2
To: The Louiswu
To: The Louiswu
For these kind of socialist versus free market ecomomic studies, go to Cato or the Heritage Foundation.
To: The Louiswu
Depending on what you mean by “development”, I’d kick it right back....”Provide evidence that taxes encourage development”.
The bottom line is that taxes are a transfer of capital from the productive part of the economy (individuals/business) to the unproductive (government).
To: The Louiswu
Why are jobs moving from the US overseas. Because our corporate tax structure says they should. Once again government is the problem not the solution.
6 posted on
11/25/2009 5:34:25 AM PST by
wita
To: The Louiswu
Taxing cigarettes at confiscatory rates has been a huge cog in the decline of smoking in this country (whether that is good or bad is irrelevant to this discussion at this point). Those industries have had to diversify into everything from mincemeat to mayonnaise, while selling lotsa smokes in China.
Rule of thumb (two sided coin): IF YOU WANT MORE OF SOMETHING, SUBSIDIZE IT; IF YOU WANT LESS OF SOMETHING, TAX IT.
7 posted on
11/25/2009 5:37:55 AM PST by
Migraine
(Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
To: The Louiswu
Ask yourself this question--if taxes increase, are you more productive to overcome the loss of YOUR income, or are you more likely to find ways of government supplementing that loss. In the long run, taxes, while necessary to a certain point, then become counter-productive in so far as people become LESS productive and those with the highest burdens seek shelters for their income instead of spending it.
For a specific example, look at the economic downturn towards the end of the Great Depression in 1937-38. That economic downturn occured just as many of the New Deal programs such as SSI, etc., and the taxes associated with them went into effect.
8 posted on
11/25/2009 5:39:11 AM PST by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
To: The Louiswu
9 posted on
11/25/2009 5:41:34 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: The Louiswu
10 posted on
11/25/2009 5:41:37 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Voter fraud is treason.)
To: The Louiswu
Use the great ‘luxury’ tax on boats from the 1990s as an example. They finally eliminated the tax on the rich to help the middle class. Bump, set, spike, game, set match.
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/03/opinion/l-boat-luxury-tax-drives-an-industry-aground-926091.html
They also might want to think about what JFK had to say on the subject:
But this is so insane it is unmanageable to discuss it with morons. The question is a bit like asking “do you have an actual example of gravity pulling objects toward each other? Just one.” Yes it really is that stupid.
11 posted on
11/25/2009 5:42:24 AM PST by
Rippin
To: The Louiswu
12 posted on
11/25/2009 5:42:30 AM PST by
An.American.Expatriate
(Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
To: The Louiswu
Read Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell. He covers this topic extremely well.
13 posted on
11/25/2009 5:50:50 AM PST by
randita
(Chains you can bereave in.)
To: The Louiswu
15 posted on
11/25/2009 5:56:14 AM PST by
caver
(Obama's first goals: allow more killing of innocents and allow the killers of innocents to go free.)
To: The Louiswu
A personal example: I own a small manufacturing business. As with all business, the cost of employing workers is the highest single category of my "cost of doing business." Taxes are a big component of the payroll costs. When the state or federal government raise taxes, that adds to my "cost of doing business" and my choices are to raise prices, reduce costs elsewhere, or lay off workers.
Since most businesses (mine included) operate on very low margins and in highly competitive industries, there is very little opportunity to raise prices, or to cut costs other than payroll costs. When taxes are raised, therefore, I end up laying off workers or not hiring the new employees I had hoped to hire. Lowering taxes reduces the cost of doing business and encourages business expansion. Raising taxes increases the cost of doing business and discourages business expansion.
By the way, businesses do not pay taxes; we collect taxes for the government and pass the increased cost on to the consumer in the form of higher prices. When that is no longer possible, business stops altogether.
16 posted on
11/25/2009 6:06:34 AM PST by
mcswan
To: The Louiswu
simple, luxury tax from the 70’s. Killed boat industry.
17 posted on
11/25/2009 6:14:00 AM PST by
MrPiper
To: The Louiswu
See this thread:
BP, ConocoPhillips Reduce 2010 Spending Plans in Alaska
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2392578/posts
BP and ConocoPhillips have reduced their capital spending and developmental budgets for Alaska in 2010 because of higher costs to produce mature fields, disappointing exploratory results and the state’s new tax regime
19 posted on
11/25/2009 6:31:24 AM PST by
NC28203
To: The Louiswu
20 posted on
11/25/2009 6:31:48 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Voter fraud is treason.)
To: The Louiswu
Many companies receive relief from taxes to develop or build facilities. Here in Reno Cabela’s got tax relief to build their store. They would not have built unless they got the relief.
21 posted on
11/25/2009 6:35:36 AM PST by
mad_as_he$$
(Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy, and ideas are bulletproof. V for victory)
To: The Louiswu
Any evidence taxes stifle development I see many cogent responses to your query. I trust they will aid you but since you could have researched the question as easy as anyone who responded, I want to know why you asked the question.
23 posted on
11/25/2009 9:58:13 AM PST by
MosesKnows
(Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
To: The Louiswu
NY used to take a big chunk of my income.
I left, in part due to taxes.
Now NY gets none of my income.
So much for “development” via high taxes.
26 posted on
11/25/2009 1:10:32 PM PST by
ctdonath2
(Psalm 109)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson