Let me start with 283: apparently you prefer Obama to a potential GOP nominee. That makes it rather hard to think of you as a conservative.
The rest of your questions are equally inane.
BW: Do you see the parallel? You don't want four more years of Obama, but what if Romney is the GOP nominee? Rather than do the right thing and vote for Romney, you instead use your vote to deliver that futile, stupid third party tally.
mm Do the *right* thing and vote for a RINO who's no different that what we've got?! If we vote for Romney, we've (essentially) GOT four more years of obama. So how is that better?
BW: Post 314: Let me start with 283: apparently you prefer Obama to a potential GOP nominee. That makes it rather hard to think of you as a conservative.
Which isn't an answer to my question at all. It's just an attempt at misdirection and misrepresentation to deflect the attention away from yourself.
He's got the support of DUers. He doesn't have the support of most Republicans. He's not going to win the nomination in the primaries. So, what's your point with all these *what if* scenarios trying to get people to say if they'd support Romney if he got nominated? It hasn't happened yet. It's not going to happen. Why do you want to know?
Why are you trying to convince people to vote for him should he be nominated?
Tell me. How is four years of a RINO, obama clone better that what we've got?
How would he be any better that you could justify voting for a pro-abortion, pro-big government liberal just because he's wearing the name of *Republican*? How is that a conservative position to vote for a liberal?
HUH?