[CPOSharky]

Speaking of boob belts...

Perhaps she thinks she can start a new fasion trend sorta like Jackie O’s pillbox hats. The difference is that even diehard libtard voters are not dumb enough to make themselves look bad on purpose.

[aruanan]

Perhaps she thinks she can start a new fasion trend sorta like Jackie O’s pillbox hats.

I think that is exactly the reason behind the boob belts. Some fashion dork working for her said, "You need a signature look, something that'll instantly say "Michelle!!!" Jackie already did the hat thing, so hats are out. Pearls are out. That has Barbara all over it. Pantsuits are out. Hillary destroyed that. You can't wear a wide variety of excellently tailored, good looking clothes. Nancy Reagan and Laura Bush laid claim to that. Hmmm, let's see, we can't have you wearing pants drooping below your butt cheeks. That's already been done by male rappers. Hey. I know. They're male. You're female. Pants below butt cheeks, looking like failed belt. Opposite of really low pants is really high pants. Opposite of pants is no pants. Opposite of failed belt is really, really obvious belt. Opposite of a typically small belt is a very wide belt. Opposite of belt loops is no belt loops. And the opposite of most belts hidden under shirts or sweaters or coats is a very visible belt right on top of everything. So your signature should be a giant belt worn as high up as possible on the outside of all your clothes without the benefit of any loops. That or a New Guinea penis sheath."

Jackie looked nice, in that 60's sort of way, but ruined it every time she opened her mouth and spoke.