Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supercomputers with 100 million cores coming by 2018
CW ^ | 16 Nov 2009 | Patrick Thibodeau

Posted on 11/19/2009 6:27:41 AM PST by BGHater

The push is on to build exascale systems that can solve the planet's biggest problems

There is a race to make supercomputers as powerful as possible to solve some of the world's most important problems, including climate change, the need for ultra-long-life batteries for cars, operating fusion reactors with plasma that reaches 150 million degrees Celsius and creating bio-fuels from weeds and not corn.

Supercomputers allow researchers to create three-dimensional visualizations, not unlike a video game, to run endless "what-if" scenarios with increasingly finer detail. But as big as they are today, supercomputers aren't big enough -- and a key topic for some of the estimated 11,000 people now gathering in Portland, Ore. for the 22nd annual supercomputing conference, SC09, will be the next performance goal: an exascale system.

Today, supercomputers are well short of an exascale. The world's fastest system at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, according to the just released Top500 list, is a Cray XT5 system, which has 224,256 processing cores from six-core Opteron chips made by Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD). The Jaguar is capable of a peak performance of 2.3 petaflops.

But Jaguar's record is just a blip, a fleeting benchmark. The U.S. Department of Energy has already begun holding workshops on building a system that's 1,000 times more powerful -- an exascale system, said Buddy Bland, project director at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility that includes Jaguar. The exascale systems will be needed for high-resolution climate models, bio energy products and smart grid development as well as fusion energy design. The later project is now under way in France: the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, which the U.S. is co-developing.

(Excerpt) Read more at computerworld.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: computer; hitech; mooreslaw; supercomputer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: MNDude

It doesn’t matter how fast the computer, the old adage remains the same: Garbage In, Garbage Out.


21 posted on 11/19/2009 6:57:17 AM PST by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Finally, a computer that can handle Flight Simulator X


22 posted on 11/19/2009 6:59:15 AM PST by RckyRaCoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Throughout history the classic way to master a new technology is to have the military use it to create new and better ways of killing annoying people. If we assigned the military the task of figuring out how to use weather as a weapon the days of wild unmanaged climate change would be over. The same goes for inventing biofuel replacements for petroleum.


23 posted on 11/19/2009 7:00:47 AM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Imagine how fast DOS 5 and Word Perfect would crash!

Or games like Castle Wolfenstein or Duke Nukem, awesome!


24 posted on 11/19/2009 7:03:05 AM PST by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
“Great, but will they play EVE?”

Nope... Solitaire and Minesweeper...

25 posted on 11/19/2009 8:06:07 AM PST by Syntyr (Mace, Kirk, Thomson, Griffin, Scusa, Martin, Gallegos, Hart - Remember the fallen of Kamdesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
The push is on to build exascale systems that can solve the planet's biggest problems

You mean we'll finally know why a piece of bread always falls with the buttered side down?

Cool!

26 posted on 11/19/2009 8:08:35 AM PST by zeugma (Raise the IQ of the planet: Nuke mecca during haj.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970

What do you suppose would happen if the computer crunched all of the data and came back with “climage change does not exist”?

My guess is they’d switch to a Mac.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Or keep shoveling tax dollars at ‘research’ until it says otherwise.


27 posted on 11/19/2009 8:18:54 AM PST by loungitude (The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Great. I’ll have to buy a new case fan.


28 posted on 11/19/2009 8:26:31 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Keep your dog. Get rid of a Liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

The answer will be...

42


29 posted on 11/19/2009 9:32:35 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970
operating fusion reactors with plasma that reaches 150 million degrees Celsius

I was just wrestling with that problem yesterday. Gave up on it for now, but I figure I'll go back to it later when I have a clear head.

Simple. Just insulate it with a few kilometers of the earth's crust. Al Gore said so.

30 posted on 11/19/2009 11:18:44 AM PST by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
"There is a race to make supercomputers as powerful as possible to solve some of the world's most important problems, including climate change ...

Garbage-in/garbage-out

31 posted on 11/19/2009 5:12:50 PM PST by steelyourfaith (Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckrodgers

Ping


32 posted on 11/19/2009 5:55:20 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Just imagine the size of a computer that we will need to understand women.


33 posted on 11/19/2009 6:56:22 PM PST by killermosquito (Buffalo (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Ernest_at_the_Beach

Note: this topic is from November 19, 2009. Thanks BGHater. Related to this new one:
34 posted on 08/31/2010 3:15:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Thanks,....been away a bit....but new video card works right .


35 posted on 09/02/2010 11:35:12 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

How many cores in the new GPU?


36 posted on 09/02/2010 5:40:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
There is a race to make supercomputers as powerful as possible to solve some of the world's most important problems, including climate change, the need for ultra-long-life batteries for cars, operating fusion reactors with plasma that reaches 150 million degrees Celsius and creating bio-fuels from weeds and not corn.

...and why people were stupid enough to vote in Obama and his minions.
37 posted on 09/02/2010 5:48:31 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
The Jaguar uses 7 megawatts of power or 7 million watts. An exascale system that used CPU processing cores alone might take 2 gigawatts or two billion watts, says Dave Turek, IBM vice president of deep computing. "That's roughly the size of medium-sized nuclear power plant. That's an untenable proposition for the future," he said.

Why? If the government's going to build the thing, then just take out of mothballs one of the nuclear reactors that have been shut down or not allowed to start up and proceed. It's not as though it's being used for anything else now.
38 posted on 09/02/2010 5:52:34 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
My card ,...a Gigabyte HD5450 has 80 stream processors and other stuff...that is the low end in the latest Radeon line....

One of the monster gaming processors XFX HD-597X-ENFN Radeon HD 5970 BLACK 4GB has.... Stream Processors 3200 (1600 x 2) Stream Processing Units

and goes for $1,199.99.

And nvidia has their new line out...Fermi with this workstation card :PNY VCQFX5800-PCIE-PB Quadro FX 5800 4GB 512-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 SLI Supported Workstation Video Card
having Stream Processors 240 Processor Cores but they do more I guess....

Was: $3,199.99 Now: $3,099.99.

39 posted on 09/02/2010 7:16:36 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Wasn’t there a Radeon demo some months ago showing one card driving 16 monitors?


40 posted on 09/04/2010 5:13:00 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson