Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker
Don't be bothered with the facts, sue anyway.

I believe the complaint is that AT&T claimed MMS functionality before it was actually available in June, 2009.

11 posted on 11/17/2009 8:25:18 PM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking
I believe the complaint is that AT&T claimed MMS functionality before it was actually available in June, 2009.

Neither AT&T nor Apple claimed it before it was available. Apple announced that iPhone 3.0 would be capable of it IF the carrier offered it. Apple also announced that AT&T did not at that time offer it but their other partners in other nations did. Apple did announce in June that AT&T had said they would be offering MMS in late Summer 2009.

AT&T missed "late Summer" by 3 days, when they turned on MMS messaging on September 25, 2009, since Summer ended on September 22nd. Perhaps the plaintiff is complaining about those three days?

14 posted on 11/17/2009 8:35:44 PM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson