[DuncanWaring]

The Supreme Court is supposed to have a say in which pieces of legislation are unconstitutional. I would suggest that the fight should not be in the Legislative branch, but in the Judicial branch.

Like the partial repeal of the First Amendment via "McCain-Feingold"?

I wouldn't put a whole lot of eggs in that basket.

[ClearCase_guy]

Well, yeah. I’ve got three baskets: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. I’m prepared to use whichever basket seems best. But right now, all my baskets kinda suck.

[o_zarkman44]

The key is to tie up implementation of those unconstitutional mandates and laws until a regime change can take place.

With elections of our own people, not of the “party” the real change will be implemented which kicks out the party way of doing business that is first, good for the party, and secondary to what is good for the people.

Two thousand pages of law, regardless of what the stated intentions are, cannot contain protections of personal freedom and liberty. Any politician alluding otherwise is a flat out liar. Deceptions are contrary to the so called transparency this Marxist administration promised during the campaign..