Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intel settles with AMD for $1.25bn
The Register (UK) ^ | 12th November 2009 14:58 GMT | Timothy Prickett Morgan

Posted on 11/12/2009 11:11:46 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Lawsuits wrapped up with cash, promises of good behavior

If you were looking forward to a long and protracted antitrust battle between Intel and Advanced Micro Devices, you're out of luck. The two companies have buried the hatchet and settled all outstanding intellectual property and antitrust lawsuits.

Under the settlement between the rival chip companies, Intel and AMD have signed a five-year cross licensing agreement and are letting go of any claims they made against each other with regard to breaches of previous cross-licensing arrangements. Oh, and AMD gets $1.25bn and Intel agrees to "abide by a set of business practice provisions".

(Excerpt) Read more at theregister.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: amd; hitech; intel; microprocessor

1 posted on 11/12/2009 11:11:47 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce; NormsRevenge; Marine_Uncle
So now the Anti Trust suit against Intel should go away ....right?

Then there is the EU...what about them...

2 posted on 11/12/2009 11:16:12 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
From marketwatch:

Intel cash fuels rival's rally

**********************************EXCERPT*************************************

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Intel Corp. will pay Advanced Micro Devices $1.25 billion as part of a settlement of "all outstanding legal disputes," capping what had turned into a protracted and costly battle between the world's biggest makers of personal computer chips, the companies said Thursday.

************************************ ***********************snip******************************

AMD and Intel also will "obtain patent rights" from a new cross-licensing agreement running for five years. In addition, they will "give up any claims of breach from the previous license agreement," the companies said.

3 posted on 11/12/2009 11:20:37 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"While the relationship between the two companies has been difficult in the past, this agreement ends the legal disputes and enables the companies to focus all of our efforts on product innovation and development," Intel and AMD said in a joint statement.

GOOD!!! When Intel and AMD compete with each other purely on technical merit, we all benefit.

4 posted on 11/12/2009 11:24:47 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
And from CNET:

Intel to pay AMD $1.25 billion in antitrust settlement

***************************************EXCERPT**********************************

November 12, 2009 6:21 AM PST

by Stephen Shankland and Jonathan Skillings

Burying a very large hatchet in the computing industry, Intel has agreed to pay Advanced Micro Devices $1.25 billion as part of a settlement of a long-running antitrust case .

The pact, announced Thursday, resolves the and extends the companies' patent cross-licensing agreement. The new patent arrangement removes < hindrances to AMD's effort to spin off its chip manufacturing business and to have other manufacturers build its processors.

In addition, Intel has agreed to "abide by a set of business practice provisions." Check below for a full list.

In turn, AMD says it will drop all pending litigation, including the case in U.S. District Court in Delaware and two cases pending in Japan, and will also withdraw all of its regulatory complaints worldwide.

AMD investors were delighted, sending the company's stock up 21 percent to $6.46 in morning trading. Intel's stayed flat at $19.84.

"While the relationship between the two companies has been difficult in the past, this agreement ends the legal disputes and enables the companies to focus all of our efforts on product innovation and development," the chipmakers said in a joint statement.

Government cases unaffected
Well, it probably won't end everything exactly. The settlement between the companies doesn't stop antitrust cases brought by governments.

After AMD filed its case in 2004, European regulators brought a separate case that led to a $1.5 billion fine, which Intel is now appealing. And last week, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo filed another antitrust suit against Intel.

"Those cases filed by those government regulators will continue," Intel spokesman Tom Beerman said. "We will continue at the same time to work with the regulatory bodies to work on those issues."

Added AMD's Drew Prairie, "We've notified the regulatory authorities of the settlement. They didn't have ongoing investigations because of us...That's a snowball rolling downhill."

Intel still must reckon with an investigation from the Federal Trade Commission, too. "Certainly we plan to review the settlement between Intel and AMD in their private litigation. The FTC has an ongoing independent investigation of Intel's practices so we cannot comment further at this time," FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said in a statement Thursday.

The European Commission didn't comment on whether Thursday's settlement would affect discussions about Intel's fine, but did say the agreement doesn't affect its regulatory scrutiny of the chipmaker.

"Intel has an ongoing obligation to comply with the Commission's May 2009 decision and with EU antitrust law," said spokesman Jonathan Todd. "The Commission continues to vigorously monitor Intel's compliance with its obligations under the May 2009 decision."

The cross-license agreement has been updated to reflect AMD's move to spin off its processor manufacturing business into a separate company, Globalfoundries, which currently is an AMD subsidiary. Under the updated agreement, AMD will be able to operate as a "fabless" processor company--one that relies on others to build its chips. In addition, Globalfoundries "is free to operate independently and go after third-party business without issues," Prairie said.

Another change: in the earlier patent cross-license agreement, AMD had to pay Intel royalties. Now neither company makes payments, Prairie said.

5 posted on 11/12/2009 11:30:59 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Intel saw their bleak future if the AMD suit had progressed further.

It was a wise decision on their part. I hope they abide by honest business practices from this point on.

6 posted on 11/12/2009 12:45:45 PM PST by TChris ("Hello", the politician lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Globalfoundries, which currently is an AMD subsidiary. Under the updated agreement, AMD will be able to operate as a "fabless" processor company--one that relies on others to build its chips."
Well processing engineers at AMD and all the other folks who operate their fabrication lines. Get ready to be downsized. The writing on the wall at your company has now been written.
7 posted on 11/12/2009 4:28:50 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

8 posted on 11/12/2009 7:48:39 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
Most AMD employees in Germany were transferred to Global Foundries; hence they have the same job that they already had.

ATI now AMD(/ATI) designs the chips and TSMC actually produces them. Same way it has been for a while. No job losses. Global Foundries may actually produce ATI chips instead of TSMC because of the terrible 40nm yields.

9 posted on 11/13/2009 10:19:37 PM PST by Use as Directed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Use as Directed

Thanks for the clarification.


10 posted on 11/14/2009 4:41:17 AM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson