Levi Johnston on Sarah Palin: She Doesn't Intimidate Me

Entertainment Tonight ^ | 11-10-09

[machogirl]

his only hope is if perez hilton picks him up as his boytoy

[GoodDay]

What's the male equivalent of a slut.

A sloven.

A perfectly good word, not much used today. Perhaps Levi will hasten its return to popular usage.

[grey_whiskers]

What do you expect at 1:30 in the morning? Coherence?

Begging your pardon.

[aNYCguy]

I'm sorry, you must have confused your links. Could you link me to the part where I say that Christianity promotes slavery? Thanks in advance, chief.

As for post 35, you'll see that Grey Whiskers, who generally displays great reading comprehension, has already acknowledged his error. Perhaps you should man up and do the same?

[aNYCguy]

Okay, this is interesting. I think #1 and #4 are compelling. But I should make it clear that I don't require politicians to have perfect personal lives, or even good personal lives, to earn my support. They earn my support through their policies and record.

With that said, what can irk me about the cult of Sarah is people who obviously do care greatly about the personal lives of their politicians holding Sarah up on a pedestal, and cultivating a sort of selective blindness. It's strange to see people getting all worked up about Bristol's boyfriend's ridiculous five minutes of fame, and trashing him with a lot of emotion, when, by the way, Sarah seems to have blown it herself in the parenting department and no one should care about that, either. It's dangerous to mix celebrity worship with politics.

As for #5, I'll put in a tentative "no" to see where you're going with it.

[Roberts]

You make a valid point. Agree.

[death2tyrants]

See post 43.

[aNYCguy]

I didn’t expect you to be man enough to admit your error. But it’s becoming clear you’re not even bright enough to follow the conversation you’re having.

[death2tyrants]

you’re not even bright enough to follow....

I can tell by the tone of your posts that you're rather upset. But don't worry, because I thought up a brilliant idea for you, pal! You can create your own vanity post, sharing your assertion that Sarah has failed as a parent, or 'blown it', as you so elegantly put it. And don't forget to mention your claim that the bible 'specifically condones slavery' in your vanity. Then I can enjoy watching the responses to your assertions. Are you 'man enough' to post such a vanity? I double-dog-dare you.

[rbmillerjr]

“It’s dangerous to mix celebrity worship with politics.”

Congratulations, you now graduate to Dr. Phil analysis certification. Your plaque can be picked up at any local bubble gum machine.

[grey_whiskers]

I followed death2tyrants' hyperlink in post 43. It went to another thread.

Here is what I read when I followed his link:

"You realize there a passages in the bible specifically condoning slavery, correct? "

which was posted by you.

So the question here for both of you is, in *that* thread, was NYCguy trashing Christianity, or just snarking?

Cheers!

[LussaO]

After I factored out all the self-confusion in your post (I presume you meant idiot FATHER, not the mother Bristol)
I could only marvel at your prophetic abilities, “set to die of meth overdose in a few years.” How do you know that? Maybe Sarah’s transforming wisdom will help him one day see the light.

If you’ve got that kind of all knowing, all seeing power, could you give me next Saturday’s Powerball numbers?

[LussaO]

Levi, go home, get a job.

* * * * * * *

I really don’t know what else this guy can do for money, if no self respecting conservative would hire him right now. If the libs are offering money and the other side isn’t, and the baby needs milk and diapers - one can see the dilemma.

[aNYCguy]

This is another great example of why you should read an entire exchange before jumping into it. See post 24.