Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
So you think you're the voice of the Republican Party?

I love Sarah but I think this is stupid! Thankfully, you are not in charge of the criteria for who can, can't be a member of the Republican Party.

39 posted on 11/10/2009 12:31:39 PM PST by lonestar (Obama and his czars have turned Bush's "mess" into a national crisis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: lonestar

I am suggesting what we should do. I am not the leader of the party.

But we need a change in tactic


40 posted on 11/10/2009 12:34:13 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: lonestar; se_ohio_young_conservative
It is fortunate that the radicalism that the left displays, does not play well in the heartland. While you might wish for a self purging of the RINO's from the party and FR, it won't happen with the tactics you propose.

That will just turn conservatives off. Not because of who you want representing us, but by the employment of tactics used by the liberals.

For Sarah to be the nominee, and for her to lead this party in the direction it has lost, she needs to speak up as she has, for true conservative voices and candidates, win, lose or draw.

By doing so, she has chased one GOP backed candidate out and made others seriously look at the values that have been ignored since Bush 41 took office.

Her simple recognition of a conservative candidate, regardless of the party choice, woke a number of conservatives to also jump on that bandwagon, and scared the crap out of the GOP elites, who have no idea which direction to turn.

The people, the true conservatives, who make up a huge part of the GOP are going to see that as the leadership that is so sorely lacking, and flock to that cause.

Whether Sarah is the nominee or not, is not the issue. The issue is getting back to the social and fiscal conservative roots that make this nation prosper.

That should begin now, for 2010, and not until that is accomplished should we consider who leads in 2012. That issue will resolve itself.

46 posted on 11/10/2009 12:51:05 PM PST by Pistolshot (Brevity: Saying a lot, while saying very little.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: lonestar

Thankfully, you are not in charge of the criteria for who can, can’t be a member of the Republican Party.


Every contingent thinks they are in control when in reality they aren’t more than a keyboard jock at best.


47 posted on 11/10/2009 12:51:59 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson