That will just turn conservatives off. Not because of who you want representing us, but by the employment of tactics used by the liberals.
For Sarah to be the nominee, and for her to lead this party in the direction it has lost, she needs to speak up as she has, for true conservative voices and candidates, win, lose or draw.
By doing so, she has chased one GOP backed candidate out and made others seriously look at the values that have been ignored since Bush 41 took office.
Her simple recognition of a conservative candidate, regardless of the party choice, woke a number of conservatives to also jump on that bandwagon, and scared the crap out of the GOP elites, who have no idea which direction to turn.
The people, the true conservatives, who make up a huge part of the GOP are going to see that as the leadership that is so sorely lacking, and flock to that cause.
Whether Sarah is the nominee or not, is not the issue. The issue is getting back to the social and fiscal conservative roots that make this nation prosper.
That should begin now, for 2010, and not until that is accomplished should we consider who leads in 2012. That issue will resolve itself.
There where having a strong personality and a star in front of it COVERS UP the tactic.
most Conservatives won’t reject Sarah, most RINOs would.
If we use these tactics against Palin’s enemies. The RINO’s are the ones pushed off the stage.
True and it really bugs me that the nominee is more often than not chosen by the BLUE states.
The primary elections need to be rescheduled. I live in a red state and McCain had been picked---by liberals in the NE states of Snowe and What's her name--- before Texas even voted. Does that make sense?