Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TChris

Symantec has always been a problematic company. Every revision of everything they’ve ever bought got a little worse until it became unusable. Norton utilities crossed that line in 2000 or so, used to be I wouldn’t even think about running a machine without Norton, but every version after Symantec bought them was a little more of a pig and a little less useful, until finally it became worthless.


23 posted on 11/06/2009 8:32:53 AM PST by discostu (The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
Norton utilities crossed that line in 2000 or so, used to be I wouldn’t even think about running a machine without Norton, but every version after Symantec bought them was a little more of a pig and a little less useful, until finally it became worthless.

That mirrors my experience exactly.

NU used to be what SysInternals is today.

24 posted on 11/06/2009 8:39:26 AM PST by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: discostu

On the flip side, I wouldn’t use a PC without Norton utilities in the Windows 3.1 days. They rocked back then, and were an essential part of having a smoothly running PC.


32 posted on 11/06/2009 9:27:54 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson