Skip to comments.
Sandra Bullock Battles Porn Star Janine Lindemulder for Child Custody
CBS CrimeSider ^
| October 29, 2009 4:19 PM
| Edecio Martinez
Posted on 11/04/2009 7:55:41 AM PST by TexasCajun
PORTLAND, Ore. (CBS/AP) Hollywood actress Sandra Bullock is embroiled in a custody battle between her husband and his porn star ex-wife.
Bullock is standing by her celebrity-mechanic husband, Jesse James, as he fights his ex-wife Janine Lindemulder's attempts to regain custody of their five-year-old daughter, Sunny.
James has had sole guardianship of the child since Lindemulder, an adult film star
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society; TV/Movies; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: bullock; jessejames
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: mountaineer1997
When I see tattoos like that on an otherwise serviceable woman I like to think they are faux tattoos. But probably not. Is there some limit to the amount of ink you can carry in your skin before it becomes unhealthy? I realize that tattoos are often part of a self-mutilation behavior which is linked to some serious psychiatric and behavioral problems, but is there an “ink load” limit that has been determined?
To: abb
Which one is the porn star?
The blond with all the tats.
Or is there really any difference?
Well, the porn star gets filmed having sex for a living and Sandra Bullock doesn't. Whether that's a real difference depends on perspective.
To: stylecouncilor
To: AnotherUnixGeek
The headline is 100% misleading since it’s James, not Bullock, who is fighting for custody. However, the fact that he has a stable relationship with Bullock will work in his favor at court, ESPECIALLY since Janine just got out of jail and, I read, is making something like $13 an hour because she can’t work in porn right now because of her record.
To: TexasCajun
Body ink tells me just one thing: “DON’T HIRE ME!”
25
posted on
11/04/2009 8:14:50 AM PST
by
meandog
(Is OWEbummer the antichrist?)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
Whether that's a real difference depends on perspective. Yes. Once upon a time, the "profession" of acting was viewed by polite society as little better than prostitution and thievery. For some unknown reason, that viewpoint changed around the middle part of the 20th century.
Some have said that change was not warranted.
26
posted on
11/04/2009 8:15:43 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
“otherwise serviceable woman”
Wow, what a disgusting choice of words.
27
posted on
11/04/2009 8:16:10 AM PST
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
[...] is there an ink load limit that has been determined?Yes, there has: More than 9 square inch of exposed tatooed skin, and you're officially "bonkers."
Tatoos of anchors, regimental insignia, etc. on the forearms of military men excepted.
Regards,
To: abb
29
posted on
11/04/2009 8:20:22 AM PST
by
stuartcr
(If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
To: TexasCajun
Gee, I feel bad for Sunny. Her mom is a low-grade whore and her dad is an idiot. I suspect Ms. Bullock is also an idiot for marrying someone previously married to a trollup.
Earth to Sandra: Get tested.
30
posted on
11/04/2009 8:22:36 AM PST
by
MIchaelTArchangel
(DEFUND THE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE NOW!)
To: stuartcr
31
posted on
11/04/2009 8:22:52 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
Once upon a time, lots of things were viewed differently.
32
posted on
11/04/2009 8:23:17 AM PST
by
stuartcr
(If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
To: stuartcr
Once upon a time, lots of things were viewed differently. I rest my case.
33
posted on
11/04/2009 8:24:17 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: wardaddy
Any pretty woman debases herself with that self mutilation to that extent has self esteem issues.. There couldn't possibly be a connection between being a porn-star and having self esteem issuses ...
could there?
34
posted on
11/04/2009 8:24:31 AM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
Um...ink-and-porn ping???
35
posted on
11/04/2009 8:24:37 AM PST
by
Andonius_99
(There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
custody battle because she is/was a porn star, or because she didnt pay taxes? or kinda both or?
36
posted on
11/04/2009 8:25:20 AM PST
by
isom35
To: section9
Bullock now has tats of her own.
Sad.
37
posted on
11/04/2009 8:25:39 AM PST
by
SJSAMPLE
To: Huntress
Nasty tattoos. I have a tattoo...and even I think those are nasty.
To: cripplecreek
Nope. In fact, her first nude scene was in the Proposal, where she accidentally bumps into a naked Ryan Reynolds. The audience never sees anything though. Disappointing... Ryan Reynolds is lovely eye candy.
39
posted on
11/04/2009 8:26:05 AM PST
by
rintense
(You do not advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. ~ rintense, 2006)
To: jyoders19
People used to scream for Janine to do guys in her films.
Then, she finally started doing guys and nobody cared.
I think she missed her peak.
40
posted on
11/04/2009 8:27:42 AM PST
by
SJSAMPLE
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson